Search results

  1. Wulf Ratbane

    No AoO w/o Combat Reflexes?

    Cool. Here's the current wording in the (edited) PDF, based on some customer feedback: Provoking an Attack of Opportunity Two kinds of actions can provoke attacks of opportunity: moving out of a threatened area, and performing certain distracting actions within a threatened area. Moving...
  2. Wulf Ratbane

    Do you consider 4e D&D "newbie teeball"?

    That's what I do.
  3. Wulf Ratbane

    Which one do you prefer your character suffer? Death vs Rust Monster vs Level Drain

    Rust Monster. I frequently define my character by my possessions, yes-- but only by the possessions I happen to have at the moment. If subsequent to the Rust Monster encounter I go from being Korgoth the Plate-Clad Armiger to Korgoth the Stick-Wieldling Loincloth Guy, well, I'm cool with that.
  4. Wulf Ratbane

    Do you consider 4e D&D "newbie teeball"?

    No, the specifics of its complexity may or may not enable a richer play experience, just as the specifics of 4e's simplifications may or may not enable a richer play experience. I have co-opted a great many of 4e's simplifications into a richer, better play experience for me. And likewise...
  5. Wulf Ratbane

    Do you consider 4e D&D "newbie teeball"?

    Out of context, that is a little nutty. But BryonD specifically doesn't find the rules harder to use, and so rather he finds that "more complex" = "better," despite the fact that "more complex" = "harder to use" for a lot of other players. His assertion is that 4e is a "simpler" game (for...
  6. Wulf Ratbane

    Do you consider 4e D&D "newbie teeball"?

    Here's the conversation you're objecting to: I'm missing the part where he conflates New and Bad.
  7. Wulf Ratbane

    Iron DM 2009 - FINAL MATCH - it's over!

    Thanks! Is it confirmed that I will face Wik in Round Two?
  8. Wulf Ratbane

    Do you consider 4e D&D "newbie teeball"?

    I didn't read that correlation at all. I interpreted him to mean, "4e is good if you are new and have no skills, and it is also good if you are bad and have no skills. In either case it is going to limit the development of your skills."
  9. Wulf Ratbane

    Do you consider 4e D&D "newbie teeball"?

    Absolutely. Where there seems to be a difference of opinion is in the proper response to a mechanical failure. If the engine just doesn't run, period, under any circumstances, then you need a new engine. If the engine fails because the operator keeps redlining it, then you have two options...
  10. Wulf Ratbane

    Iron DM 2009 - FINAL MATCH - it's over!

    I could use a status update. Where does the competition stand at the moment? Is there a summary post being updated?
  11. Wulf Ratbane

    Do you consider 4e D&D "newbie teeball"?

    The DM cannot "cheat." He can run a good game or a poor game. Sometimes running a good game means thwarting the players. Sometimes running a good game means letting the players succeed. For some players, exactly the converse is true; and for some players, they don't want the DM to make those...
  12. Wulf Ratbane

    Do you consider 4e D&D "newbie teeball"?

    Wow. Unexpected and unintended, I'm sure.
  13. Wulf Ratbane

    Do you consider 4e D&D "newbie teeball"?

    I'm aghast that you would suggest that I am "aiming" at "targets." It is against the forum posting rules to ascribe motives to other posters. All of my posts are meant to be read verbatim without any inflection that is not present in the written word. Any such sarcastic or snarky inflection is...
  14. Wulf Ratbane

    Do you consider 4e D&D "newbie teeball"?

    And because 4e doesn't have any rules for how AC is derived that they can correct you on, it's smooth sailing? 4e actively changes the hearts and minds of your players? They really should have played that up more in the marketing.
  15. Wulf Ratbane

    Do you consider 4e D&D "newbie teeball"?

    I don't play D&D as a competition between myself and the players, so that definitely skews my perception a little bit. In my game, the intent is for everyone to have fun, DM and players. It's a cooperative play style. And in 3e, you absolutely positively cannot say, "It has appropriate...
  16. Wulf Ratbane

    Do you consider 4e D&D "newbie teeball"?

    It hints at a certain recalcitrance. Really? Snark is against the forum rules? I know. I used to dread the last hour of every session where I was required to hand over my DM notes to the players so that they could double-check my work for accuracy. Not to mention the fines subsequently...
  17. Wulf Ratbane

    Iron DM 2009 - FINAL MATCH - it's over!

    I have won many rounds through (or perhaps in spite of) deliberately playing with the meaning of the words. No judge in my experience has ever dinged me because he had a specific word usage in mind that I failed to meet. Personally, when I see an ingredient like "rogue hydra," expect the judge...
  18. Wulf Ratbane

    TRAILBLAZER - PDF Release - Discussion/Questions/Errata

    :lol: It was more a matter of reframing your question to cover anybody else who might be more alarmist about it. If the subject's type changes, there will be interactions with other aspects of the rules where it does matter. It's a bit of a rules artifact, agreed.
  19. Wulf Ratbane

    Do you consider 4e D&D "newbie teeball"?

    Hmm. Indeed. The proudest moment of my life was when I finally got back my official 4e permission slip so that I could change my assumptions and start creating monsters according to my needs and goals, rather than slavishly following the process and being forced to care how I got there. 4e...
Top