Search results

Hey, can you pls explain how does the below work? When I go to a wall and use it, I dont need to roll stealth and am auto-stealthed vs everyone not-adjacent? Aka none can roll stealth against me and I ll remain stealthed forever? Thanks ------------------------------ Cloaked in ShadowYou...

You are probably thinking of Seldarine Dedicate, which is a Paragon Path Elf/Eladrin Cleric.

Ok, unsure how rule-friendly this is, but for the intersted in the end it is Lvl 12 Drow Hybrid Ranger / Warlock (Binder), Darkstrider With Star Pact, killing something allows for one round Invisibility and Fluid Ki feat for a one square Shift at the end of the same turn. MCing into Assassin...

Well, sure. Why not. But I m mostly interested in Tiers of Play. I saw a description somewhere for 5e, but cant find one for 4e. It said something like Level X to Level Y - "You begin to travel to different planes now..." etc. So I was wondering if there is a description like that somewhere for 4e.

Hello, we play the way that we set level and we dont level since. Currently we ve been playing 12th level in 4e for 5 years. We play roughly on "Aragorn" level. We are known in lands where we come from and the important people know us all around the continent. We have been thinking if we are...

If you have a D20 like that, I would love to try it. Also, this was not really a thread about why is this a good or bad idea. We want to try it out.

2 players, one GM. So not even the 3rd player :)

Pretty much a great sumup, thank you. We are only three (2 players) since we were 10 y/o and we have been playing this way for 16 years. We play 4e since it came out, except a few month break for 5e.

There are my reqs at the top of the page. I was going for ninja stealthy archer with fear and mind-illusion spells, perhaps occasional fireball.

So if I understand correctly, wouldnt this be solved by MCing? Right now I m trying to decide the main striker for its at-will, so unsure if to go with Rogue, MCd with Warlock for Shadow Walk and teleport every round, or Sorcerer for White Lotus Master Riposte MCd with something... or ranger...

We are only two players in this group. So hopefully will be okay enough to be a perma rule.

Yea, this would be something I d look for. I was initially looking at Sorcerer with Lotus Master Riposte, but Twin Strike might just be better. I d appreciate if you have any specific combinations in mind.

These two classes dont really work in my mind to fill the "Arcane Archer" theme I wrote about.

Hello, we will be trying a new houserule next game: Limiting Power Pool by power source. So for instance Hybrid Warrior and Cleric would allow for all the usual powers fom Warrior and Cleric, but also for all the Martial and Divine powers from any class. Only Encounters and Dailies, because...

Could you elaborate a bit more on the Free-Form class system? I alwayshoped to see a system like that, if it is what I hope it is.

We ve played and loved 4e along its entire existance, never had to use a grid. And only the GM drew it for himself on a plain paper.

I meant in more in a way that someone heals something else, or buffs... It would be even okay for me if the fighter healed somebody else this way or use indomitable on them... I bet they could be motivated a bit once per fight. But I wouldnt wanna see cleric dressed as warlord, that is all.

If you already have a cleric, I would go Warlock 3, Rogue 3. Pact of the Blade and Fiend from Warlock gives you magic weapon, hex, THP whenever you kill, Armor of Shadows or whatever you want from the invocations. If, later on, you would level more, you can go 5 / 5 for the second attack and...

I wouldnt say I am against warlord. I am against "martial spells". It s completely off for me, martial healing/buffing whatever. If you wanna use it: "Weeeeell for some reason, it isnt magic anymore; otherwise it works just like cleric spell" Thats my problem really. Why make a class that works...

It opens up some stuff and more options to classes, especially if you are allowed to MC. Wouldnt say any of them are OP. Strictly for the character building itself... I dont know. But if you enjoy the rest of the book and would use it somehow, yes, it is worth it.