Search results

Intracaso designed Lockwood explicitly to assist 5e players in porting over to the system, conversion wouldn’t be too difficult!

K

(Stops packing the giant dragon miniature with a bow and birthday card) well. I see.

Personally I’ll happily go with a company that (1) apologizes and (2) sees that we can f*ck with the money if they piss us off enough and reacts accordingly.

Maybe.

Good enough for DC studios to say “hell yeah more of that please”

I feel like the book of many things is going to be a dumping ground of “all the rules we made for 5e that we don’t have a place for in 6e but need to profit in anyway” I am excited for both Planescape and am curious on Phandelver

I always forget that Guardians was the first movie in the “Action Comedy involving team of misfits” genre.

I refuse to be a part of not seeing Chris Pine do fun things.

Looks fun

That’s fine I was just joshin’ ya

Someone doesn’t know about the death of Aroden and the fall of lastwall

I’m currently running Shackled City and I am about to run a “The Alexandrian Remix” Eberron based dragon heist

100% depends on what I get. But since I don’t need or want a VTT, not much

Watching this thread, I got stuff I need

I just figured it was because they were reprinted as MMotM

On this same note: there is precedence. In an unearthed arcana article leading up to strixhaven, WotC attempted this. It didn’t make the cut but I’m pretty sure they went back to the drawing board with it rather than scrapping the idea

I’m not saying every subclass is designed to be cross class but having some be is awesome. I personally am getting tired of “here are 70 different archetypes that all amount to eldritch warrior”.

I don’t believe it was intended to be palatable more that it was “this is what’s coming and this is the best offer you are gonna get” strong arming. Sort of a “give this idea legitimacy by signing this now and we will give you this tiny concession”

I think it’s neither. I think they are preparing for cross class subclasses