Search results

It would have been neat if there was a Star Trek series that covered the Enterprise F and her Andorian captain. A book or TV series would have sufficed.

How about this take on the Shaman from Laser Llama? https://www.gmbinder.com/share/-M-6Rt87VW4p1cfPpPWO https://www.gmbinder.com/share/-N6Oo4k2AJmkFG06__DB

There have been pictures of him since 1e and 2e.

It's cool. The character creation process is something of a journey in itself. You start with a concept for your character and then flesh them out by making certain choices. Agreed. Now which version of the Ranger is considered unnecessary by some? Every version of the class has its' respective...

Ah. :) I see the journey being the way a character is played in an adventure from start to finish. Completing an adventure is the destination. :) An adventure in D&D is full of twists and turns in the form of a main quest and one or more side quests. You can either stick to the fast and direct...

How exactly are you benefitting from the shorter path then? And why do you assume that the destination is more important than the journey?

A rival RPG company that came out with a 3e-adjacent RPG to 3.0/3.5 D&D.

Meaning?

Compared to PF1, 5e doesn't have that many. The former has 7 different groups of dragons (chromatic, metallic, imperial, primal, planar, outer and esoteric). 35 true dragons in all.

Only if it is the first time you have taken such a route by yourself. The first time is when you are likely to get lost because you are trying to understand the directions, of which there could be a lot of them that need to be followed. But the more times you take that route, the better you...

It's very scenic. ;)

This is a Draconal Agathion from Pathfinder 2e. It's much better looking than the PF1 version IMO. Back when I was collecting PF1, I wanted to play as an Idyllkin Aasimar Monk (Scaled Fist) who was the descendant of a Draconal Agathion. I think I would borrow some elements from the Essence...

Less character classes in an RPG works well, if not better, for you. But for others such as myself, more character classes work well for us. More classes for me lead to more choices and opportunities on what I can play as in an RPG. Especially in an RPG like D&D or one of its' adjacent RPGs...

In essence, the character is the avatar form of the player within the setting. ;) They are who we would like to play as. We get to explore through them what would it be like to be an elf, a dwarf or a dragonborn and as a member of a particular adventuring character class.

Not always, it depends on who designed the class, subclass, etc. and how long they have been at it.

If Eastern Dragons were brought back to 5e D&D, what would everyone like them to be?

3e's Unearthed Arcana did present both the Ranger and the Paladin as 15 level prestige classes. As for them being subclasses of the Fighter in 5e, the Fighter gains subclass features at 3rd, 7th, 10th, 15th and 18th. Is that enough subclass levels to make a Fighter (Ranger) and Fighter...

Then there is the stuff that homebrewers like Laser Llama come up with such as the Magus and its' 12 archetypes.

As for the heritages, the one second from the left and the last one look interesting. The former looks they're from the Japanese series Kamen Rider. Kamen Rider media usually revolves around the titular defined group of motorcycle-riding superheroes with an insect motif who fights supervillains.

Currently 5e has fewer classes than PF2, which currently sits at 25 classes (minus their archetypes). PF1 had 36 classes. Level up just has 15 classes.