Search results

Sure! I allowed it myself the other day. I was running Phandelver with one player, and a sidekick, and the sidekick succumbed to her wounds, but I didn't want the sidekick to die outright. Tweak to your hearts content, you're supposed to make the game yours.

One does not simply use Beholders and Mind Flayers, they are the foundation of an awesome campaign. Just kidding, you can use them however you like. I do like them as BBEG, not random encounters, like an owlbear, or goblins, for example.

I don't blame anybody, but I do credit Stranger Things.

What's funny is, this cover is in line with all previous bestiaries by Paizo. Maybe they have not changed their style enough? I think that is a plus, I like the Pathfinder flavor, so I'm glad they are not changing the recipe. I do wish they slowed a bit the crunch dept.

All the flavor pointed at them being primarily psionic users, could you avoid that? sure, specially if you don't want psionics in D&D. I happen to like Psionics.

Ok, I stand corrected. My group liked it a lot, as we switched to it 100% when it came out. I think Skills and Powers included conversion notes for The Will and the Way. I have to check my books.

Yeah, I don't know which one was published first, but for example, The Will and the Way which was a Darksun product, used the same rules that Skills and Powers used. I think that makes perfect sense. It would've been weird to keep two systems.

mTHAC0 (menthal THAC0) was based on different stats, so yeah you needed a different THAC0

https://dnd.wizards.com/articles/features/character_sheets

I'm disappointed the Mystic will not be in the book. Psionics was an important part of Eberron to me.

The alternate cover looks awesome though:

not sure yet, something to discover I guess :D

I like the layout of the book, and even though I need reading glasses I have no trouble with the fonts, icons etc. The character sheet though makes me want to pull my eyes out :D. Who wastes color ink on a character sheet anyway? very minor gripe though.

I didn't participate on the playtest, or kept tabs on it, so I'm looking at P2 with fresh eyes, and I like what I see. I don't understand the details fully, but I think the changes to multiclassing are great (now archetypes), also the introduction of backgrounds. At first I thought there were...

Looks like it's just behind the D&D PHB now in #2. I don't think it will overtake it, but it's good to see people still like PF. I will always be thankful to Paizo for keeping the OGL alive, and for providing support for a system I still enjoy, even if I prefer 5e. I'm looking forward to...

The Spy Game! The Spy Game looks great; it reminds me of Spycraft. Backed it!

A giant fire breathing lizard. Not too weird I guess, but this is back in the 2e days

It's an epic image, I really like it.

I just wanted to point out that this is an FAQ addressed by WotC, counter-counter is specifically allowed.

Seems rather arbitrary to allow you to counterspell only some spells, the complexity you try to get rid of is still there. I debated applying a similar rule with my group. The reasoning being as mentioned here, you are interrupting yourself by casting counterspell in the middle of the casting of...