Search results

Now that Bo9S is out, and seems in flavour for a samurai, should we not revisit this whole process by using the maneuver system, perhaps?

From the rules quote above, it seems he is quite eligible. Extra Spell seems stronger than I thought for a Sorceror. Extra Spell: Resurrection, or Extra Spell: Miracle seem really cool. =)

If anyone disagrees with you on the internet, shil, than you are not RIGHT. You might be "right" but you are not RIGHT. unfriendly analogy removed - plane sailing

Perhaps a Sorceror, then, can use his primarily drawn from clause to learn it, if he can prepare arcane spells? ;)

What would you say if a Helm of Opposite Alignment were placed on the Celestial?

If the Sorceror had arcane preparation, and was thus able to memorize/prepare spells, why couldnt he use lucubration, or rary's mnemonic?

I would add wraithstrike to all serious melee monsters with spell powers, if a PC was abusing this. Sounds like a disjunction level tactical nuke, though, "If you dont use it, I wont" situation waiting to happen

Tougher? I am the tactical combat masta.

Wraithstrike is clearly abusable. I think Scorching Ray is also clearly abusable. Some combos, as many Magic players will tell you are bad. Some combos can win games, and still be bad. Some combos are good. Some combos are BROKEN, and all decks should be built around them, until they are...

Wait, who are we comparing them to? They have equal skill amounts to a human, so they dont get your iconic 1 xtra skill, they have 2 lower dex skills, when compared to an elf, and 2 lower spot, listen, search, and worse everything else, what are we comparing them to, a half-orc?

I blame Nightfall. He only shows up to 1 out of every 3 of his sessions. =P

The DM is well within his rights to rule 0 every rule and play make believe. The Sorceror is explicitly allowed, by the rules, to learn spells from other spell lists. The wizard is explicitly barred from it. The fact that I can use rule 0 to play cowboys and indians with D&D does not change the RAW.

Normally, I would agree with you, Felix. For example, Aasimar is worth its +1 LA, and the reason is, Aasimar are iconic Clerics, and Paladins, and everything they have makes them better as both Clerics, and Paladins. They are unquestionably good at being their Iconic classes. My issue with drow...

This thread is now on my favorite list for when I need Star Wars NPC names. You are all immortalized. And your all nerds.

Chrte Gisyd Nosesc of Advil OMG worst idea ever.

I prefer to throw the alignment system out, and have no interest in playing chaotic greedy. Or Lawful stupid, for that matter. I do, however, enjoy playing real characters with grey feelings on a number of interests. Complex people in a complex world, as opposed to black and white people with...

As written. Remember, there is a Living Eberron right now using Drow, AS WRITTEN as LA +1, and no one is complaining about the imbalance. It WILL overbalance Drow Paladins, but honestly, except for me, who'd play one? For almost every other class/race combo, the Drow is a strong LA +1 and...

Hypersmurf shoots! He scores!

To be more specific, the reasons you cite are why Drow are +2 LA. The fact that none of those bonuses worth together for the same character is why common sense tells me they are in fact much better placed at +1 LA.

Int and Cha are non-associated ability scores, unlike Wis and Cha. They are used for different classes, with the single exception of Rogues, and not all rogues are also faces. SR is unquestionably worth +1 LA, its just not worth it equally for all classes. Many classes, liek Wizard, can cast...