Search results

I don't care what the mongoose said, to me Conan is probably a level 5-7 character.

I don't think 4E combat really needs to be that faster comparing to 3E. It does need to be smoother though.

They've been working pretty darn well in Iron Heroes for some years now. Kudos to Mike Mearls.

If they don't sleep 8 hours per day they become fatigued. What about the fact that fighter can swing a 12 lbs. Greataxe for 16 hours ininterruptly without getting tired? Doesn't that hurt verosimilitude?

I don't think Hit Points will be "per encounter" so character will eventually need to rest.

So characters will have a greater number of options, but the overall power of their options won't be so high. The character won't be as powerful as the 3E characters, but will have more things to do. Nice. I had an insight today about how they are making multiclassing a more viable and...

Yes and No. There IS the Rapid Strike feat." When using a melee weapon, you may make two strikes as a single attack against a single target. You take a -2 penalty on you attack roll, but you dealt +1 die of damage with a successfull attack." It's like Power Attack, you trade bonus attack for...

I didn't play too much with melee characters in SWSE, but the jedi guy wanted to be the dual lightsaber type of jedi. When he died, at level 8, i think he managed to actually use his dual attack feats, throughout the whole campaing, less times than I have fingers in my hands. So pretty much...

Hey I have a gaming group just with girls, and myself as the DM. Since I believe WOTC is caring even more now about bringing more girls to D&D, I think my group would be an excellent playtesting opportunity for D&D 4E! The girls even sent a picture to see if they would fit the WOTC's standards...

Maybe. The text could be just fluffy description. "The sharpshooter was dead before the third arrow struck home." That could mean in game terms that he actually rolled the damage of the second arrow, ( the first was that immediate attack, and 2nd and 3rd the attacks that could be from SAGA...

Maybe. What about multiple monsters? We were already told 4E will have more monsters per encounter, so character will need more rounds to wipe them out? In SWSE there is cleave, double attack, dual weapon attack, so multiple attacks still exist but characters just need to invest more to get...

But you are playing a "stereotypical" wizard! You are playing Gandalf! All this talking that wizards should use their spells wisely, that the wizard player that uses all spells in the first encounter is a fool and all the ideas you have that I saw from this and other posts regarding magic, you...

Few people paid attention to your post. :( Unfortunatelly for some people reason is not as fun as bash-on-guesses can be.

What game are you talking about? WoW? Yeah, there is a lot of acumulation there, we need lots of bags. God bless the auction house.

Maybe your the encounters are just too easy, or our enconters too tough. I still didn't see any valid (logical) point to believe D&D becoming WoW is a bad thing, yet. I hope everything concearning rules, powers and playability in 4E can be as good and smooth as they are in WoW. Adding to that...

And I hope they also introduce Frog Rain, Split the Sea, Water to Blood and my prefered, Water to Wine! :D

Is there any example of a 4E "per encounter" mechanic so we can take a better look at and judge it? Or are we just making assumptions based on nothing? Because I can see lots of mechanics that are effectively "per encounter" without being technically PER ENCOUNTER and thus not hurting our...

God bless satiric comedy! :D

Nobody will actually believe you, not even you. ;)