Search results

For the record, I had a similar discussion with my Dm. Basically, assuming he creates a campaign where all the PC's start at, say, 13th level, and I'd pick a wizard with item creation feats, he would allow me to use my share of GP value on previously crafted items, meaning that I could possibly...

I also agree that teint frumps uncaddy nodge

... AND rogues (masterwork ones at least), AND two weapon fighters, AND two-handers... About only fighters use large shields. As soon as you cast spells, you're better off with a buckler.

Go check the Brutal Throw feat in complete adventurer p. 106

Thanks. My cleric player will be happy to hear that.

The wizard/race poll got me to think... Almost invariably IMC and my DM's campaign, I and the others always pick a human. Are we missing something obvious ? Is there a core race/class combo that is much more efficient than a human ?

My players say that a cleric can weild his buckler in one hand, his sword in the other, and can use his buckler hand to cast spells. Are they right ?

Well, there's already two fixes for that. The Mystic Theurge, and the feat practiced spellcaster. It's not perfect, but it's a step in the right direction...

Magic item inflation at epic levels. Back in 1st Ed, you could play 40 or so level characters, but didn't need +20 items to "stay in the game". The magic items in the DMG were quite sufficient, it just meant you probably had all the +5 versions of them. And you Kicked Major Arse. You could...

Thanks, good enough for me. I mean, I always felt that it would make as much sense (if not more) on a two hander than on a two weapon. You say it's errata, I beleive it. Or want to anyway...

I couldn't find it, but would very much like to see that errata. Link please ?

The exalted feats for monks are really tough for monk characters to acquire. In order to be viable, a monk needs high wis and dex, good str and con. To top it all, most exalted feats for monks have a prereq of Cha 15, which is useless for all other monk specifications. Tough...

I think that's a mistake. It should read Ki Strike (lawful), which is a prerequisite for Sanctify Ki Strike (top of feat chains often include the non-feat prerequisites of previous prerequisite feats).

You guys seem to think I was disagreeing with your stance. I never did. I was just responding to the following: :p

C'est fait.

Clever. Then I guess it's up to the golem's master to give it the following order: "Kill anyone you notice that is not me.". No mention of rooms of any sort, or entering them, or whatever.

I thought golems don't have access to skills ?

That's interesting. IMC, we have cohorts gain the level AFTER the PC went up, meaning that the fight that makes the PC gain a level is not the one that also makes the cohort level, but the next fight right after. Granted, it's easier to simply have the cohort level at the same time as the PC...

For what it's worth, I agree with your stance. That said, you do tend to attract (or get involved with) those not-so-gentle rules debates.

The int bonus of a sword is: --. Swords are not intelligent. Some magical swords are imbued with a soul, and have the intelligence of that soul. The int bonus of a construct is: --. Constructs are not intelligent. Some constructs are imbued with a soul, and have the intelligence of that soul.