Search results

I haven't looked at them myself yet, but the sorcerer that can steal peoples HD to power their magic. That doesn't sound boring in it is surface (like I said I haven't read the subclass yet).

I was talking about combining narrativist rules w/ simulationist rules

Aren’t both daggerbeart and the cosimere (so) rpg tackle those?

I predate the Atari so…

Yikes! I must be old, that sounds terrible to me

The expansions will be $15 each

It looks like the new monster is “Demodragon” to my eye.

I don’t have the numbers in front of me, but IME CR 5 is not a threat to a group of 4-5 level 3 PCs and CR 7 even less so for level 5 PCs.

You can always change the difficulty, the question was how the adventure was designed

Is this correct? CR 5-7 encounters are a cake walk for a group of level 3-5 PCs This otherwise looks very interesting.

Is that it, no other good ones?!

No, 5E does not have anything like that. Hiwrver that is how the developers described it several years back. It might’ve been a Sage Advice or something like that, but I just remember the developers talking about it.

That is an interesting distinction. I don’t know that I like it for wizards either, but it might be an interesting way to differentiate the two.

So what I gather from these responses is that it is less important what the psion can do, but instead how they do it.

In response to the OP: eat, drink, and make baby psions.

We run a homebrew 5e with a mix of 14 & 24, but mostly our own version

What do you consider a 1-shot adventure? How long to expect the game play to be? What levels does this cover? Does it include the monsters / npcs or do you need the MM or books to fill out the stat blocks.

My notation was +9 to hit / a 23 AC

That is what I did - I always just forget which side the hit goes one. So, All my numbers should go up by 5. So 50% is better then 35% same idea tnough

Yes, that is what 9/23 means: +9 to hit a 23 AC is hit on 14 out of 20z 20-14 =6 = 30%