Search results

Then we couldn't have beholders or displacer beast!

Fighter is a better start than ranger if you just want to be good with the bow. Ranger's get no weapon focus or weapon specilization. Now if you want more skill points and the other ranger stuff ranger would be your choice.

I think enworld would be such a community, here there are people here who have played every edition of the game and even some who play the previous editions.

I only have maybe 300 dollars of non core 3/3.5e books and the gamers in my group have a similar amount of money invested or less. So if the new rules are good and look interesting we'll at least try them out.

Intimidating Strike in PHBII lets you make a regular melee attack as a standard action and if you hit you may roll in an intimidate check (or something along those lines). I think brutal strike in PHBII lets you cause an opponent to be sickened if you nail them with a bludgeoning weapons but...

He should switch con and str. Stength helps with ranged damage and ideally he won't be getting wacked that much.

I only don't like them because they're not evocation. Schools should keep their divisions. But otherwise they seem fine.

I think this feat is too strong. Look at the benefits of +1 LA (at least for a non caster), are those benefits equal to a feat. The answer should be no. If the answer is yes then either that creatures LA is too much or you over value or use overpowered feats. Consider also taking this feat 3...

If you just wanted to use an Saga edition NPC class in standard dnd I fail to see the problem. Other stuff might cause difficulty. DnD NPC Class: Hit Dice: d4 BAB: As Cleric Good Saves: None (not sure if you should make all saves +0 for all levels) Skills: 1+int. modifier, choose any 5 skills...

Create another feat that requires imp feint and spring attack that allows this combo to work, propose it to the DM.

Nyeshet's suggestion sounds fair, trading a class feature for another class feature sounds more balanced. Though I'm always hesitant in a class based system of swaping class features or making them feats, as you do this enough and it dilutes the classes to being meaningless. Though I do like...

I would suggest Woodland stride and possibly something else for rangers, as woodland stride isn't too strong of an ability. Bard should get inspire courage +2, paladins could possibly get some lesser version of the Holy Sword spell 1/day as a spell-like ability.

Now I think this is too far in the opposite direction.

Extra skill points as per human is my typical house rule. That way they get some thing from both side of the family.

As long as a character isn't so weak as to become a liability I don't care.

I miss some of the people I played with.

Get a scroll of polymorph any object, use the scroll to turn it into something better that would result in a duration of permanent. Troll is always a popular choice for polymorph (not sure if its permanent though), but I'm sure you could be more creative than that. Alternatively just get a...

If you enjoy the game keep playing. Possbily bring up your suggestions to him after a session. But I can see your anoyance at his houserules, don't sounds like the kind I would enjoy. I find it ironic though that he completely removes the tactical movement aspects of DnD, then borrows a...

Sounds like a cool class, hopefully it exist. If you can't find it the Druid's alternate class feature in PHBII might be a good starting point for making it.

Anyone think Order 66 an extremely weird thing to happen? It's like the Storm Trooper Effect working extremely in reverse. I mean normally jedi's are really hard to kill but then one day a bunch of clone troopers just up and finish half of 'em or more.