Search results

Then replace "class features" with "class traits." The same rules apply. You can have an 8 in every stat and still wear plate as a pal. Your stats simply dont matter with regars to armor proficiency granted from your class.

I think that if it was the latter then it would say so. The warlock is supposed to move around a lot. Allowing the warlock to benefit from staying still doesnt make much sense. You must keep moving closer to different enemies in order to curse multiple enemies.

The rules for crits say that you maximize any damage dice. If there are no damage dice, there is nothing to maximize.

I have still yet to actually play 4ed with my regular group, but so far I have crafted encounters and a light story from 1st to 22nd.

Not according to RAW, however I wouldnt let my character sleep in anything but cloth.

No, fluff actually means nothing what so ever when it has to do with what the power actually does. If the sleep spell actually put you to sleep it would say so. It wouldnt say unconscious (save ends).

So because the giant stick has a string on it you cant beat someone with it. That makes no sense what so ever. When you use a bow as an improvised weapon it is no longer a ranged weapon. Its just a giant stick that you are using as an improvised melee weapon.

But the sleep spell doesnt make you go to sleep, it makes you unconscious, which ends with a save.

Thats not what I was saying. The range between the warlord and the target is melee. The range between the target and your ally is melee with your ally being the originator. Why would you give someone else an extra attack? Maybe because they would be better at attacking than you. Maybe...

The only problem is that this scenario wouldnt work if the range between you and your ally was adjacent/melee. If the warlord and a rogue are flanking a target, the warlord is not going to be within melee range of the rogue unless the warlord is using a reach weapon, which makes no sense. Its...

Why would he have to drop the bow? He isnt using it as a bow, he is using it as a giant stick. Are you telling me that just because the giant stick has a string attached he cant beat someone with it?

Fine, then from the PHB page 55:

Twin strike: 1st attack (main weapon): STR+1/2 level+weapon proficiency+enhancement bonus+feat bonus+misc 2nd attack (off-hand weapon): STR+1/2 level+weapon proficiency+enhancement bonus+feat bonus+misc

There is a clear distinction between wielding something and holding something. You cant hold your own hand in that very same hand, however it makes sense that you could wield your hand as a weapon.

The range is melee and the target is one enemy. It seems pretty clear to me that its just that one ally makes a basic melee attack against the target of your power, and the target must be within melee range. If your ally is 30 feet away and can still make a basic melee attack against the...

Not directly through, only crossing a corner, unless that enemy is helpless or two size categories or larger or smaller than you.

Yup. The thinking is that a wall or some other form of obstruction is occupying the entire square, however monsters dont.

So that people who multiclass know specifically that they can take those skills.

Munching as in eating, or munching as in engaged with?

Just as it would be left to the PC is they did it on a monster. Its clearly a goad/false opening/whatever. Why shouldnt PCs be subject to those? Because you as a player are more intelligent then that and have out of game knowledge? I just dont get what issue there is, or could possibly be...