Search results

I think I'll go with that (with slight modification, due the fact I'm not sure the website supports strikethrough.) Thanks all!

Hey all, I hope I can tap your writing expertise here. I am running The Pathfinder Experiment at a gameday next month, and need a short (1 paragraph ... 3-4 sentences) blurb explaining to folks browsing the entries what pathfinder is, in an enticing an informative way.

Publish a game that interests me.

Thanks for all the encouragement guys. :)

Who's asking? :) Yes, Caesar Slaad is the handle I use for some younger forums.

1) I was a member of ENWorld before Pathfinder was a twinkling in Paizo's collective eye. 2) I much prefer vbulliten to... whatever that is that Paizo uses.

You are coming to DC gameday, right? You can possibly even play one... Or is that silly "marriage" thing getting in the way still? :D

Greetings, ENWorld fellows. I thought I'd share my little "experiment" with you all. The motivation behind this little project is to address some criticisms and concerns regarding how well Pathfinder addresses its design goal of compatibility with the D20 3.5 rules. As stated during the run up...

The way I see it, the favored class rule has the effect of: 1) the already mentioned bonus for staying single classed (and giving you more trade off for PrCs). 2) it also helps counter-balance the long list of class skills that multi class characters will get under the new rules. It seems to me...

I am very happy with my Malhavoc & Dreamscarred product from 3.5. Pathfinder gives me a highly compatible follow on for 3.5. I'd expect the same from a Pathfinder Psionics system. Bruce's Mindscapes Psionics system is cool. It'd be great if it could show up (probably renamed, since "Mindscapes"...

Man what? Oh, I rather think different forums at RPGnet have their own character. The RPG general forum can be pure gold. The 4e forum, commonly known as the d20 forum... not so much.

Meet at the Embassy; snag a table at the Hyatt if we can.

This has been addressed, but let me restate it to the point: It's a standalone product with all you need to play. You don't need Spycraft. You can use elements from the Spycraft family in your FC games as supplementary material.

FYI, small update: There is now a full sized preview up on the RPGnow product page. Fantasy Craft - Crafty Games | EN World PDF Store

AFAIAC, the set as set forth in the 1e PHB should stand as a minimum. I failed to vote for either elf as your subtitling of them was 4e-centric. If there is a singular elf entry, it should be the high elf and should not be called the Eladrin, which IMSHO is a cheesy name appropriation.

Yeah, those are great for those with tinkering love, though I admit that part of the reason for my love is pure nostalgia over undermountain. DutM is sort of a "retro clone" of Undermountain, if you will. If you take a look at the maps, you will see they are stylistically VERY similar to...

My favorite mega-dungeons for 3.5 are Rappan Athuk Reloaded (but good luck finding it for a reasonable price) and Castle Whiterock. I actually think Castle Whiterock wins out on playability... it's scaled better and has less un-fun killer DM moments. But for pure "dripping with evil" style...

Well, let's hope that the reason for their delay -- retooling Spycraft into the mastercraft, which would then make other mastercraft games go quicker -- pans out. :cool:

It's still d20 vs. DC. Though it has much less of that D&D feel than many d20 games, it's still d20 at its core: classes, levels, the basic 6 stats, etc. It's still a "traditional game"; there's just more depth and importance to the skill system. Non combat activities are rewarded. You get...

Yes, I got both Pathfinder RPG and Bastards. :cool: