Search results

If I ever get a chance to play as a PC again, I'm going with a ranger two-blader. I'll have to do away with the nature fluff and make him more monkish. For some reason, I want to see a firefly/BSG crossover (I bet you somebody would think River is a hybrid). There would be Cylons on one...

You did that with class design as well, didn't you (with divine defenders having a leader bent and arcane strikers with a controller aspect)? You sneaky devil. *goes back to thinking about what a martial controller would look like*

I don't care who has it but I want my two weapon fighter. He's human btw. I didn't start reading the books until about 5 years ago but I'm fairly certain the ranger had two-weapon fighting before Drizzt showed up. Either way, who cares. The more options supported, the better, regardless of...

It was implied in the wording of the paladin's challenge. I suspect that there is a paragon feat similar to the warlock's Twofold Curse.

Regarding multiclassing: did he say anything about taking a feat?

Ok. I've read the whole 6 pages and nobody has deciphered the blurry cards at the bottom of the excerpt. Does anybody have photoshop? And, now I have this odd urge to play a dwarven rat-keeper. I wonder how a bag of rats would work as a grenade-like weapon. It's gotta be good for a...

Oh, Absolutely! I'd buy that in a minute. For the PSP.

I have a question. I've never played WoW. How similar are WoW stances to bo9s stances?

QFT

I remember thinking that very thing. I thought it was a good thing however.

Yeah, the biggest disconnect to me was equating buying books to saving puppies from a burning building. I like capitalism too but still…

Yeah, there are so many possibilities. And I didn't know WOW has stances~ good on them.

I don't see the parallel here. Perhaps it would be more like eating the puppies, regurgitating them, and then raising them? The harm(eating the puppies), I would assume, would be that WotC would lose $ because you are downloading the rules without buying them. However, if you buy the books...

You always get quoted more often when you appear to be trolling. ;) EDIT: I do agree that the name would seem to imply a bonus to defenses but +2 to saves is really good.

That does sound good.

I would love to see that in the mm but not so much in its own book.

So, I was reading this scoop and was intrigued by this: I was disappointed when it seemed that stances were not going to make it into 4e. This does, however, look like an early draft. *crosses fingers* I hope this hasn't changed.

Well, I'd still buy it but I'd be very disappointed. So, while I voted "I would purchase 4E even if it were completely closed", I still would care. A lot. EDIT: I'm not sure. I like the different directions that other companies take me and so I'd probably be distracted with something else...

Good point, we should probably get those first. Oh yeah, that too. I'm just glad we know how healing works.

If we have him hostage, why would we only ask him one thing? Multiclassing, then rituals, then, if he's still conscious, non-combat encounters.