Search results

There was a reddit thread way back during the Kickstarter that ended up getting into what people were going to import into their game: I think the thing that is easiest to import is straight up the classes. You have to follow the bouncing ball a bit since they rely on all the other systems but...

Yeah looks like an "oops" to me as well. That means there's no 'new' feature for the Bard at 9th level. Just access to new options for things features they already had - new trick, new battle hymns, and 5th level spells 15th level is similar but they list the increased bardic inspiration die on...

Very cool! Something we'll see on the enworld store or have a kickstart for probably?... Maybe...?

I believe this is the guy: Discord - A New Way to Chat with Friends & Communities I'm not sure if this is the best way to link to discord messages so someone feel free to do it better if i'm making a mess of it :)

The latter. At the point of using the spear-thrower, the javelin, spear, and trident just become ammunition. Their individual stats are moot. The weapon you need to refer to for everything (unless you have some magical ammunition) is the spear-thrower itself.

It looks like you are trying to find whether an item is magical at all and not what a magical item does. I also don't see the line about handling giving away that an item is magical. Understood that you are trying to run by the book but that rule is easily imported and has a whole slew of...

Yes activating a stance requires spending exertion. The cost is listed in the same way as other maneuvers (Heavy Stance (1 point)). I'm not sure about the herald question but my gut reaction is that you cannot spend hit dice in the same way other classes allow.

Yes.

This is so exciting! I still can't get over how big the books are compared to the O5E counterparts. I had to look something up in the PHB yesterday and it hit me how different the ~300 page PHB compared to the >600 page AG is going to look on the shelf :D Do you (or anyone else with experience...

O5E has the ammunition property which is where the requirement of a free hand to load a weapon comes from. When I was searching the Adventures Guide for answers to the spear-thrower question, I looked for that property or anything like it and didn't see anything.

It has the loading property, which means it can only attack once per turn, and it does not have the two-handed property. Looks pretty clear to me that a shield is in the cards. I'd agree that attacking with a great sword from 80 ft away multiple times per turn while holding a shield is...

Changing a specialization to a new one is much different than having two active at the same time. I think unless we get a dev clarification, I'm going with the "get a second specialization" from the 8th level list.

Happy Sunday! The subclasses here are wonderful. Love the thematic combination of fate spinner/divination. A berserker class with that theme is really fun, similar to how the wild magic barb O5E subclass feels. Very excited to look through the exploration challenges as well!

I think it's the other way around. The version on a5e.tools is old and needs to be updated.

Thank you much! I can now let all my players use this!

You are Uber speedy. Did you post it already?

That's awesome. I took a quick glance over them and realized I had no idea the philosophy behind the artificer spell list so wasn't sure how to start

@Faolyn - do you have any thoughts about adding the artificer to these? I tried searching your previous 5e versions but it didn't look like it had been done there either.

I have severely underplayed the extent to which the campaign gets involved in the intrigue and lore. I pitched purely as a "steam punk ish fantasy investigators with an interesting world history". I can't wait till they start to realize the depth they will get pulled into. Additionally there's...

Expertise definitely does increase passive scores (pg 402). @Faolyn, I can do some mental gymnastics to get me to justifying adding specialities and temporary/situational expertise to passive but there's no explicit inclusion for them so it's very hard to say what's intended from my read.