Search results

I went back to compare the PrRC's quote of the Scalegloom Hall rules, and I don't seen any variation.

*sniff sniff* Hmmm, smells crunchy in here.

Half-elf multiclassing Do people think that the half-elf's class ability to take an at-will power from another class and downgrade it to a per encounter power is actually a bonus multiclassing feat at 1st level?

Wouldn't be surprised, but I'd like some more evidence first. I would assume all wizards would WANT to take Arcana anyway at this point :)

Guess not. Simplest answer I guess would be to just change the proficiency bonus on the warhammer from +1 to the standard +2, for now.

I'm glad you are giving Warhammer a Pro +2, as it 'fixes' Kathra, the dwarven fighter, after it was revealed that Dwarven weapon training does not give a +1 to hit. Though if a 1d10 Warhammer is not a Prof +1 weapon, what is? Only the very very biggest weapons I guess - Greataxe, great club?

Yes, this is what I'm going with. I'll add this in...I was just waiting until Wednesday's weapon's excerpt to see if there was something else going on behind the scenes...like Constitution being used for her attack with a Warhammer perhaps? Con +4 +1 Fighter +1 Proficiency = 6

I'll change this in v2.4 - thought I caught them all. My understanding is that if the power has the 'Weapon' keyword, then you add the weapon's proficiency bonus to the attack roll. Same with implements for powers with the keyword Implement, such as a Wand +1. You are right about the AC...

Tira, the half-elf Warlock also has a 3rd language, which would give the warlock 5 trained skills. I did have the wizard with 4 trained skills, with the extra skill being spent on a language as you suggest, but it breaks down when you add Tira to the mix. The other alternative is that the...

Updated to v2.3 Edit (May 5): Updated to v2.3 • Added racial feats from the Racial Benefits excerpt http://www.wizards.com/default.asp?x=dnd/4ex/20080502a • Edited Skill Challenges from the Skill Challenges excerpt. http://www.wizards.com/default.asp?x=dnd/4ex/20080505a • Added bonus trained...

As far as we know, heavy armor reduces speed by 1 square. Since the halfling is wearing plate, his original speed must have been 6, then reduced by the armor for a final speed of 5. Dwarves may also move at a speed of 6 and have their speed reduced by heavy armor too, but so far PrRC has...

I've fixed the class summary table to match the class entries for v2.3, and added Trained Skills: History to the Eladrin's race entry. I've moved the bonus feat back to the ranger from the Eladrin, as the feat seems more in line with a ranger than the Eladrin. The feat is probably coming from...

I've had this interpretation in the PrRC before in an earlier version, but it wasn't very popular at the time. I also thought originally that classes that share the Divine power source got 1 extra healing surge, but that was incorrect as well. I would agree that the paladin's bonus healing...

Here are the Burst and Blast diagrams from the PrRC . link I had a lot of help from others on these (especially FranktheDM)

Yes, all the feats from the Racial Traits excerpt will be added or corrected in v2.3.

I'll change the other powers on the list as well to Dexterity or Strength vs AC. Its hard to see how this has been overlooked so long! The added note about not adding Dex damage is mine, to clarify how Careful Shot changed from the original D&DXP sheets and the revised versions posted on WotC...

I could very well be wrong indeed (about a great many things). One explanation might be that wizards rely on their magic instead of skills to solve problems, so they get cantrips - 3 at will powers - instead. Seems like a more than fair trade for a trained skill, perhaps?

I think Green Knight is right; Skill Training gives you +5 to a previously untrained skill, regardless if it was on your class skills list or not. Spending one feat to add it to your class list, then a second feat 2 levels later to add the +5 bonus seems overly expensive. As far as I can tell...

Reading over the ranger's powers again, I think you are right - instead of 'ranged' it should say Dexterity (no other powers say 'ranged' or 'melee' in the attack line). So, it should be: Dexterity +4 vs. AC Note the +4 is specific to this power, not from the Dexterity modifier. I'll change...

Updated to v2.2 Edit (May 1): Updated to v2.2 Changes include: • Added “How to Read a Power” excerpt. http://www.wizards.com/default.asp?x=dnd/4ex/20080425a • Added "Multiclassing by Feats" excerpt and edited feats table. http://www.wizards.com/default.asp?x=dnd/4ex/20080430a • Added...