Search results

Dimension Door states "You can bring along objects as long as their weight doesn’t exceed your maximum load." "You can" suggests that the caster has the option of. Since the harpoon is an object, the caster would have the option of not bring it with him.

Don't forget that there is an additional cost of Improved Buckler defense of the -1 to hit.

Well, here is what I think might be part of the confusion of this thread. The op did not specify those details, but used the equation for a continuous magic item. This is why so many have found it to be unreasonable. An item that casts Mage Armor, is not nearly as powerful as one that provides...

I like this idea. Though I would suggest 2 levels of ranger for the feats.

I am not sure if they are Conjuration(Healing) but there are two series of spells in Arcana Unearthed that heal.

I agree. I have always thought that these were two different slots.

While it is 4000 cheaper than equivalent bracers, this price is acceptable. The 4000 gold difference is the cost of being vulnerable to dispel magic.

The catch is that while you can persistent some nice spells, due to the massive turning attempts needed to power it, you cant have many persistent feats up. Especially since you need at least 2 feats for archery. (assuming elf domain for PB)

An example of the situation that brings this up is: Half-fiend Tyrannosaurus. HD 18, CR 12 So a party of 4 level 12 PCs are on level with this creature. Yet when it uses Blasphemy the PCs are 6 HD below the CL of the creature. This means they are all paralyzed for 1d10 minutes.

KarinsDad- The 50% bonus cost is based of the table in the magic item creation section that details which slots are for what effects. Given that the table lists cloaks as a protection slot, I do not see the need to attach the 50% extra charge. Bracer/Glove slot- The MIC has clarified that these...

There was a chain of feats from the Blackmoor campaign setting that lets a player create a bond with their mount. The mount progress with each feat in the chain to become better. At first look, it seemed like a decent trade off.

Yes

Monks, they do not have the option of normal armors, and cannot cast the spell, and I see the listed price for Bracers of Armor being the appropriate cost for an armor bonus, since it mirrors how other non-caster classes get additional armor bonus from magic items. Arcane casters have the...

For a comparison the twilight and ghost touch are the necessary enchantments to simulate having +5 AC from normal armor. This is a legitimate comparison. The pearl of power is a valid option, but does have its own draw backs. Those being that it is now a buff rather than an item. This means that...

The familiar does not have the spell casting ability so he can not do scrolls and wands, but a talking familiar such as a parrot or raven can activate command word misc items. Another trick that a friend of mine is found of is taking improved familiar with an imp. Then going into Loremaster...

Why? Are these not the necessary magical modifications necessary to allow a wizard to use a chain shirt as though it were bracers of armor +5. As far as pricing is concerned, the magic item creation rules state to first compare against existing items, then use the equations as a guideline...

To further this, while it does give more damage, it does have stricter requirements to get the damage, and as Derro said it does not gain the additional benefit to skills that FE does.

If you did the region option as a replacement, then it would be easier for the player to remember. It is easy to remember that you get bonus damage while in a city, rather than having to see if what you hit is a specific creature. Thus in any given combat you only have to do the think about it once.

gabriel_z, the issue is that there is an existing item that already uses the spell Mage Armor as part of its creation. The equations as before mentioned are guidelines and you should first compare a new item against existing items. Also mage armor is better compare against a chain shirt, since...

Sorry, I was using the wording that others in the thread where using instead of looking up the specific wording. What I meant is that there are the incorporeal touch and then there are touch attacks. They are two separate attacks and are resolved using their own rules.