Search results

August huh? Right on! Last I heard we wouldn't be getting any real amount of new who until 2015. :)

Man they really want new players directed at their website. Hopefully this is something they've prepped for. Though the "box" thing mystifies me - weren't the last two (BASIC type) box sets made out of the crummiest, thinnest paper possible? I know mine were. (But the first one for 4e was...

Well, it was scraped together from an article for BECMI D&D in an old issue of Dragon (109 or thereabouts I think).

Alas, no D&D so far this year, which is unusual. But it's more a pattern of "very little gaming at all." This isn't as bad as it sounds, as the time is being filled with things that make me equally happy, but still...no D&D. The year is young however.

What, no option for "I'll just be buying things for the table top?" Surely someone else feels this way....

Well...so far nothing. Unless the game on release is substantially different from the latter incarnations of the playtest documents, nothing at all. I'll keep an open mind once release and hype have come and gone but so far, nothing's prying me away from Swords & Wizardry, DCC, or any other...

I couldn't possibly agree more. Those names coming up on something I'm otherwise interested in turns that interest to ash pretty much immediately at this point.

They did. As I recall one of them was even played by Mark Hamill FWIW. I've seen a few eps of Arrow - nothing going on there to keep me watching alas. A bit too soap opera-y for my taste. In any case, I'll give the new show a shot, much as I did Arrow.

Sadly, I suspect that there are those within WotC who would also like to know the answers to some of these questions. Not all of them and I don't have such an inflated view of my opinion to think I know which, but at this point I wonder if the reason we've not heard is because WotC is still...

I dunno. There's definitely some interest here but a lot of that kind of left me scratching my head. Inevitably, I'll wind up comparing it to the 1990/91 Flash, of which I am inordinately fond. I am wondering if this is intended to be consistent with whatever they've done with Barry Allan in...

<b>edit</b> Bloody hell, I posted in the wrong thread! Either way, I do definitely remember Alien Nation - the movie was good but I was just getting into the series when it was cancelled. The subsequent movies were kind of hit or miss tho. Given that the concept was very much about the...

Fascinating idea - and incredible artwork as always. Are you doing any more interiors for the book?

Oh wow, I had no idea. The red box was the only experiential contact I had with Essentials-era 4e. NEEDLESS to say (well, not really but we can hope, right?) repeating that particular mistake would be extraordinarily dumb on Wizards' part. A starter set should be limited - it's a starter...

Wait didn't the 4e redbox have chargen? Sort of a solo adventure then a group adventure etc etc. The starter set from 2008 did *not* I know that much. It may have been abbreviated but there was something there as I recall. Honestly, I'd prefer that such a starter set emulate the 81 Moldvay...

Keeping it to third party supplemental stuff - Requiem for a God or When the Sky falls, both by Malhavoc Press for 3.5 and both incredible.

Oh, nothing to save then. The first thing I'd do is change the basis of the engine from 3rd edition. Little else will bring me back to Pathfinder.

Alternatively, the "Air Age" (though more like the First or Early Air Age, as the Jet Age was another kettle of fish entirely).

The Diesel Age?

See, after having run Pathfinder for the better part of two years, I could adopt this as my sig and feel quite happy about it. I love paizo as a company and I do like a good bit of what they come up with flavour-wise, just not their rules systems. The Beginner Boxed set might have sold me...

Damn, I miss Batman Beyond.