Search results

I thought the same but was nice enough not to say it.

That is the way I would rule it. Yes they must be evil, but they also must be smite worthy. 1. your fighting with a evil foe and you call upon smite...yes 2. You trying to get something from a evil merchant and he just tells you to bugger off...No Kinda like haveing a gun just because you can...

Well they paused everything once 4e was announced. Then announced a whole buch of 4e stuff only to not get the GSL. Then when it did come it was unusable to them. They are not a full time company so they could wait. Unlike others, paizo, goodman and green ronin to name 3 But it seems as a...

what I am saying is being evil does not mean I kill people.. CE maybe as they see no right or wrong they are psychopaths more or less. Now say that barkeep stole from the books, made sure he got a little extra, he robs people by over charging giving drunks the wrong change back, maybe lets...

I think detect evil works just as it sounds it does. It detects evil from I chected at bingo midly NE to I eat baby's CE Smite works on evil. Paladin needs to know who is evil at times. Besides just because your evil does not give the paladin the Lawful right to randomly kill you. The bar...

Well yeah a paladin is LG anything else really isn't a paladin :)

Paladin I can see as you have options but I don't get how the cleric seems more complex

well 2 things I can think of 1. Shipping distribution. It needs to be shipped and stocked by street date. That takes time 2. Gencon. It is planned to go live so to speak at Gencon

OH I like, I am also glad to see the new feats made it though with some still being fighter only.

Well if ya look back at 2e Noble drow had all the goodies while common drow did not. Sure common drow could do darkness or fearie fire but that was about it. And if ya recall ability faded on the surface I wouldnt mind going back to something like that But in many ways LA was a joke, and a...

Level adjustment needed a Hammer took to it for a long time now. Good ideal maybe but, bad, bad execution

Humm looks liek I will be adding a 3rd book to the list of must buy's

Ya know, The more I read the more I like

see thats the issue 4e and 3e have the same name but really are not the same game. To may changes the system is not the same. Pathfinder is changed some from 3e. Some people may like that system more, find it more to the likeing. This isn't a bash on 4e , but not everyone likes the same type...

man you stalk the place. I do really like the changes to channel and defensive casting

most used and best likes Sharn:city of towers and races of eberron. You really can not go wrong with them 2

Yeah am running legacy right now with pathfinder rules and it's well written and very cool. I really cant see any issue with converting part 1. Far as I have read so far. A few fights would work out great with the 4e minion rules I would think. That ones current, fun...and Gnolls...and genie...

I say you mean Dannager's runelord one. He has it linked in his sig

Yep was talking about the now out of print mags, although I think the PDF are still available at paizo, but as I find PDF's useless for me I forgot. But most if not all of Staps monsters should now be in one of the 4e books. I dont have them so cant say for sure

I know nothing of 4e, so really can't say what would be easy. Some rooms in all the paths I have seen are small, some monsters are not ment to be minions and others will need minions put in them. I myself love STAP just love it. But many of the dungeon like are's are small not sure how to...