Search results

i don't see it as that, warmagic is checking if your action to be spent on casting a cantrip, not 'part of your action', plus you're not using your action to cast a cantrip, you're using it to take the attack action, which you're then substituting part of that action to cast a cantrip, i feel...

unfortunately i disagree with most of what you say here, but i have no real desire to start quibbling over hypothetical implementations so i'll leave it at that.

i would say no, because both feature stipulate for the effect to trigger you need to be performing the cantrip casting/attack action as an action, which if triggered by the effect of the other feature, you're not, warmagic the attack is made as a bonus action and bladesinger extra attack the...

this is quite close to how i would implement shields (i'd implement heavy shield slightly differently myself) but i'd much prefer shields to be their own category of proficiency rather than being tied so tightly to the other specific armour tiers, so that you could end up with things like...

oh you mean a 'fast designed' template rather than a 'fast small' template, was trying to square the -5ft speed with 'being fast'

and you think that doesn't matter? would you be satisfied if you could only order 'a soda' and what one you actually got was purely random? up to the whims of the server.

except all those products you mention, it doesn't really matter what brand you get it's still functionally the same type of product, bubble wrap is bubble wrap, but coke is not pepsi is not fanta is not sprite is not 7up so referring to them all as 'coke' is just confusing.

i wasn't talking about there being new rules of a tiny creature being able to use equipment, i was talking about the old rules (or significant lack thereof) you mention and the appearance of the idea that, yes, the tiny gnome can wield the greataxe and have 5ft reach and frankly that's pretty...

elaborating on this, i just don't think 5e ruleset is designed in such a way that ever intends player characters to be Tiny (unless magically altered in which case it is a temporary state and their gear is likely altered too), it relies too heavily on the convenience of everyone being more or...

It’s a nice idea but ultimately one that i think would cause alot of hassle, if i could change one thing myself to give gnomes more their own identity it would be to lean more into their nature spirit roots, make them more akin to a cross between firbolgs and genasi.

if spell focii weren't so omnipresent i would say that stocking and preserving enough material components on a voyage for a caster to be constantly prepared is both difficult, annoying and expensive,

threads concepts that make me wish i actually knew anything much about 3.5.

i wonder how different the poll results would be if minor magical items weren't included in that category? the lack of healing potions and bags of holding might be a lesser factor in that category but they're also a massive convenience feature, if people had those would they be more inclined to...

a nice idea but good luck getting anything near a singular answer to start working back from given all the opinions out there, just look at this very thread.

if a character is learning two new spells per character level that would be four new spells per spell level right? i might even go so far as to say you need three spells known of a level before you can learn the next if you really want to push the choice of to go wide or deep, although three...

i don't think you need a second two spells of a previous level to keep learning more for the next level, so you'd end up with something closer to 9, 5, 4, 2, 2, 2, 2, 2, 1, though i might be wrong in @Hussar intentions 1st: Conjuration, Conjuration, Conjuration, Divination, Divination...

while i too favour magic to be implemented more for 'problem solving', utility, support and control over damage i'm more than fine with the existence of a singular designated 'blaster caster' class, however, this is in a scenario where plonking a damage oriented martial into a group of enemies...

and the package they're wrapped up in is important for a non-negligible amount of people, do you have the right to dismiss their preferences?

while i might not agree with all their listed desires i think it's a poor response to someone who said 'here are the things i want martials to be capable of' with 'it sounds like you need to be playing a spellcaster'

struggling to identify what it is that you're saying here, is this an 'any sufficiently advanced technology is indistinguishable from magic' point? i guess that's true, but you can still have magitech function differently from casting that makes both have different benefits, a globe of...