Search results

Why tho What purpose does that serve in fiction or mechanics

OK but what would you put the rogue under then

4e Martial is "not magic"

Arcane is honestly a power source that could be eliminated and nothing of value would be lost. You could replace it with Fey (new source), Shadow, and Elemental. Lose the wizard and replace it with a few more flavorful and focused classes like a beguiler (fey), binder (elemental), and...

That doesn't sound like "we plan to add older editions" to me.

If they drop the worthless DM screen they can up the page count.

And the one they didn't.

That's really underselling it.

Hey, at least Moxie is still being sold.

Ice Age would be my #1 choice.

Except my favorite flavor isn't available and the formula is a trade secret grumble grumble

And it mostly didn't matter because there's generally no way of knowing when it's worth swapping out your best general-purpose power for a niche thing.

You already can. They're called at-wills.

This would be a rights nightmare.

ITT: People fix 4e by making it not 4e

No you didn't. How would this work with non-psionic classes taking augmentable powers? How would this work with different primary stats? What's the point of my fighter grabbing a battlemind power if I need constitution to hit with it? This undermines the point of multiclass feats and hybrid...

Same base rules with some minor changes/additions, wildly new content.

Ugh, no. This is best done by cutting bad powers not diluting class identity. There is zero reason for a rogue or warlord to ever take the fighter's Come and Get It, and giving the fighter access to something like Startling Offensive would be a balance nightmare. Frankly this reads like a...

So why bother?