Search results

Hey, the catch is you have to roleplay what you wrote down! And the idea with presenting multiple options is good.

I think max bonus at level 1 should be between +5 and +10. +8, maybe?

What if we left behind the Law-Chaos and Good-Evil axes, and instead defined a series of alignment traits that the character has, i.e. honest, pragmatic, greedy, faithful, selfish etc...

Sword sage and faith warrior classes added. Half-fiend templates added (including, but not limited to, half-balor, half-bebilith and half-succubus).

I think named levels should stay as an option. Having every level be named is not a good thing, however, as it leads to nonsensical titles, as mentioned before. Re: multiclassing. Maybe make similar titles for similar classes (warrior/ranger/warblade/what have you). Maybe one level every...

Can someone explain the differences between those three types to me?

Love the idea. On topic: I'd use the above type of chart or use gp/xp interchangeably, as in 1e.

Aristocrat and adept classes added. The messenger of the gods advancement path added. Vampire template added. Here you can find the complete development history of this ruleset.

Aging rules added. I'll work on the aristocrat tomorrow.

I think that if the modularity is going to look as it was presented in this thread, then the goal would be: "explain what options A, B and C allow DM and players to do in a few simple sentences, easily understandable".

Today, I added starvation/thirst and suffocation rules. I'm thinking of adding the aristocrat class at last and the templates (half-fiend, half-fey, vampire, etc. etc.).

Wow. Love your posts. You must have put a lot of thought into this and researched it a lot. Everything is so clear and detailed... I wish I could write like that... instead of simply telling my players that I want a tiered skill system...

Someone else reported this glitch to me earlier, you have to set the source language to Polish manually. Then it works. No idea how GT thinks it's English...

Money system added. Any ideas what I could add/improve? I repeat, Google Translate allows you to read the system as it is now. I'm thinking of tweaking the way attributes work. 1) maybe one attribute governs defense and the other attack - a bit like in Legend 2) maybe give a choice of the...

Like both the idea and the site. I'd put a disclaimer in bold at the main page, that states "This is a derivative work. Harry Potter is (c) JK Rowling.". A small thing but makes it clear who has the rights to what and then there's no way you can get C&D.

I downloaded 'Legend' yesterday and am reading it right now. It has some good ideas indeed.

1) HP renamed to Stamina Points. 1/2 and other fractions changed to be the full number of advantages. 2) Compulsory training introduced. 3) Trying to decide which dice are the best.

I think keeping all the timelines is the way to go. As far as presentation is concerned, 3e was better.

Don't know, but the idea is brilliant!

Bump. Marshal class and a lot of manevuers added.