Search results

Trend points to success if you have the word "Star" in your title. I have a hard time thinking that Starfinder sold at "Pathfinder levels", so from this we might discern the motivation for a 2nd edition Pathfinder. Given this I think we can expect Pathfinder 2.0 to at least match or surpass...

Hi! Thanks for the reviews. One thing that would be very helpful to add for these reviews is just the year the product was published. Just so that I don't have to go Googling for that info before I read the review. Regards /M

Free PDF, so why not check it out, that’s my take.

Warhammer Fantasy Roleplay, first edition hardback.

Sure. I have the same problem in almost everything I do. People just don't read what other people write. For example if I send an instruction to a client in an email, listing three things I need them to do to move the project forward, I can be almost certain that they only read item number one...

I wrote for Kult. I think that answers your question nicely. ;)

I believe that the point that the other posters are trying to get through is that they expected better from an RPG publisher. What happens at a table and what is suggested to happen at a table by the publisher through the rules of the game are two very different things. At least that's how I...

I am excited. I am curious if Paizo will adapt something akin to the slower release schedule of WotC when it comes to 5e. /M

1. BEC(M) - we stopped at Companion set 2. AD&D 1st - Dragonlance took a while to get through 3. D&D 3.5 - rekindled the D&D fire 4. D&D 4th - ran two campaigns 5. D&D 5 - our current version, slowly building up to take the number 3 spot /M

For table-top list: Greg Stafford Dave Arneson Gary Gygax Steve Jackson Steve Jackson Ian Livingstone Bryan Ansell Richard Halliwell Rick Priestley Marc Miller Also I think Mary Shelley should be in there if we include literary giants.

Acererak 16 Asmodeus 19 Demogorgon 14 Graz'zt 10 lggwilv 14-2 = 12 Iuz 21 Tharizdun 21 Tiamat 5+1 = 6

Acererak 17 Asmodeus 23 Demogorgon 20 Graz'zt 10 Iggwilv 12 Iuz 21 Lord Soth 6+1 = 7 Tharizdun 23 Tiamat 14 - 2 = 12

Acererak 21 Asmodeus 23 Demogorgon 23 Graz'zt 10 Iggwilv 11-2 = 9 Iuz 23 Lord Soth 16+1 = 17 Tharizdun 23 Tiamat 19 Vlaakith 1 Zargon 3

Acererak 21 Asmodeus 22 Demogorgon 24 Graz'zt 11 Iggwilv 13 Iuz 21 Lord Soth 23 Szass Tam 8 Tharizdun 23 Tiamat 23 Vlaakith 10 Zargon 13

Warhammer Fantasy Roleplay 4e.

Thought about that too, then I saw that this is labeled a "review", and that gets on the front page I suppose. If the title had included "review" it would have been a lot more clear. /M

I enjoyed your post up until the end paragraph. Have a nice weekend. EDIT: Now that I have access to a computer, I will elaborate a little bit on my "understanding of economics works". The knowledge I have enables me to run a company with twelve employees and an annual turn-over of a little...

Pulling the strings? A very dramatic reading of my posts, where I basically posit that WotC has input into the pricing structure of DnD Beyond. Is that such an alien idea that we have to bring in dramatic readings of my posts to discredit it? /M

What I'm thinking is that WotC wants to keep the PH, DMG and MM, and other digital books priced at about the same price as the physical books. My guess for why this is, is so that the digital books don't push the value of the physical books down, that is that people start expecting to pay less...

Well, yes, because then the value of the PH is 1 dollar, while the cost for producing it is, I dunno, let's say 10 dollar for discussion sake. So the PH then becomes a losing proposition for WotC, and they would shut the game down. But my reasoning about this is hypothetical in the extreme, so...