Search results

Which means it’s up to us to keep making enough noise for there to be a story.

OOOOH! THERE COULD BE RULES FOR CURRENCY SIMULATION! Not the whole economy, because that’s usually not needed, but just a few things that the adventurers might experience that signify what’s going on in the larger world. E.g. Kingdoms short on cash but high on ambition might start to dilute...

So, disclaimer: I’ve never played O5e or A5e above level 7, excluding one-shots, but I know that lack of support for high-level play is a common point of complaint regarding O5e as it gets harder and harder to present meaningful challenges to players. Having not looked at this super closely...

I think you could have both scientific and narrative advice depending on how hard you wanted to go on world-building. E.g. Talk about how island chains form from moving volcanoes, but also talk about the narrative possibilities island chains hold.

This might be more feasible than you think, seeing as there are some great world building video channels like Artifexian on YouTube that go into detail on exactly that. If we can translate his content into some simple guidelines, then most of the work has already been done.

Great! I approve! But that still means the case wouldn’t show up in Norway. That’s my only point.

But under the OGL 1.2, you would be sued in the US state of Washington, not in Norway.

The nice thing is that became of the leak, WotC would be sued by other creators first for trying to deauthorize the OGL rather than it going to court because WotC sued some poor sap, which helps frame what’s at issue in the case.

What's still standing in your way? Prepares designer notepad

I don't have a definitive answer, but the chromatic dragons in A5e all have spellcasting variants that don't impact CR (in theory). I would compare your ideas against them as a baseline.

As much as I would have loved a normalized schedule, I'll admit that being able to port in O5e subclasses so easily was a big reason I switched and why I was able to convince my players to switch.

The Necromancer, which was released on the website. :)

https://www.dndbeyond.com/posts/1428-a-working-conversation-about-the-open-game-license

Closest you’ll probably get are the Mechanoskulls, although they’re the wrong CR.

While we’re here, can we also ask what to make the Machinist artificer having a feature that references the Stop action, which was removed in the errata?

I know the art is very pretty and all, but the only thing I can think is "Huh. Steampunkette has hitchhiker's thumb."

So the AG clearly includes several archetypes that are intended to replace the archetypes from O5e. To give just a few examples: Wizards All 8 subclasses -> Arcanist archetype Druid Circle of Land -> Guardian Circle of the Moon -> Skinchanger Warlock Archfey -> Spellbound Fiend -> Diabolist...

For the record, I was imagining this as the next countermove when they release the “Real” OGL and it inevitably falls short of what’s needed.

I know! :) That’s why I’m bringing this thread back up.

#DnDBegone was obviously great for getting attention from WotC, but we also didn’t get what we really need: a public, legally binding statement from WotC that they cannot deauthorize the OGL 1.0a. Unfortunately, we can’t cancel our subscriptions twice, and the movie won’t be out for another few...