Search results

Thanks, everybody. It definitely felt off, but I lost internet shortly afterwards so just now got back to read yall's thoughts.

Was reading this article... https://geekdad.com/2025/10/why-dd-spellcasters-should-take-exactly-1-level-in-wizard-and-no-more/ and wondered if it was accurate about using the spellbook?

Bolded makes a great monster ability.

Working in retail, here was our scale; A. See in Theater B. Buy on Blue Ray upon release C. Buy the DVD D. Watch on paid streaming F. Might watch eventually for free.

Certain defenses should negate certain enemies. IMO. Owlbears may not be problem solvers. (Or are they? Hmm)

What style words are you using to get that look for the groups?

The Abyss - so engaging, immersive, good message, all around fantastic movie. Star Wars - speaks for its self. JC's The Thing - almost horror, scary sci fi premise with faced by regular people, imagery is chef's kiss. Bladerunner - all been said upthread. Alien/Aliens - both deserve a slot for...

Definately raises versatility. Less spells overall though. I like it, no need to reduce castings.

They've already been lowered.

Same here.

I will check this one out, and the others.

I know about the "needs a spell lot" rule (guideline?) But I had an interesting idea. Special druidic menhirs could take the place of spellcasters. (you could assign then x of x level slots per day). Or ley lines!

Have a palate cleanser before we continue the debate...

Good points. Overall I think the "balance" lies somewhere in the middle between the two "opposing" viewpoints. Not in the polarizing extremes. Such is the internet (not you) and the world these days

Talisman? Heroquest?

The concern may be that some groups after an encounter would/could wait 24 hours and THEN take a long rest. Perfectly valid gameplay if you want/like that, but with narrative or time story constraints it becomes problematic. (I could't resist translating that concept into my "long rests are...

Quoted for truth!