Search results

I don't think that was a jab at non-standard work hours - the original point was that if Musk is sleeping 8 hours a day (at any point during the 24hr period) then he doesn't have anywhere near the work ethic he forces his workers to have, and pretends that he himself has

You aren't missing anything. Rangers are OK, they are totally playable, but they are easily the weakest class in the game. Not by a gigantic margin, but enough to make it feel bad for anyone who loves playing them.

The spell does not mention anything about this, so I would assume creatures can still move thru it just fine (other than taking damage). It both a) isn't specifically mentioned, and b) doesn't make sense (they are intangible animals), so I'd assume creatures can move thru. I don't understand...

From a quick DnD Beyond search: Animal Influence, Puzzler's Wit, Resistance*, Swimming, Three Wishes, Water Walking *This one alone could be 10 different rings with the various possible resistances

I would not put any limit on rings other than what naturally comes from limited attunement slots. Humans have 8 fingers, I'd assume most species are similar - if the DM is giving out more than 8 magical rings per person, there's a bigger problem

That's a good question, I don't consider them to be base rules so I kind of forgot all about them. I'll amend my statement to "all of the new rules in the 2024 PHB are available for free" As far as I can tell, the complete Bastion rules are available for free in Pack Tactics' youtube video...

I don't see any problem with this* and have always allowed it, although this practically never happens. *Assuming you mean using two different bonus action abilities in the same turn, and not using the same bonus action twice. I would not allow the same bonus action twice

Not exactly, I do like 5e quite a bit, I was more using that phrase because it is commonly used and describes the situation well enough. Whatever you thought of 5e before, it is slightly better polished now and you'll probably have a similar but slightly more positive opinion of it. But bottom...

Yeah isn't Dwarf one of the most common races to choose for Wizard because you get medium armor without a fighter or cleric dip?

I would say it's almost exactly the same, except in a few areas where it is better. WotC successfully performed an excellent turd polishing. As far as pace of play goes, we have a couple players who were excruciatingly slow before, and they still are. Other players who were reasonably quick...

If it were me running this, I would let the players escape without the dragon attempting to attack. The dragon just got its ass kicked and would've lost badly if it hadn't fled. It wasn't even close - the dragon was at 10hp with two PCs still at full health. Why would the dragon assume it...

It is no more "impossible" today than it was 10 years ago when they included one in the 2014 PHB and a second one in the 2014 DMG. There is no "need" to mention everything, you have one page where you mention as much as you can fit. You can fit quick references to a hell of a lot of...

True Strike already uses Charisma if that is your spellcasting ability, so it works great for Bards as is

^This for me. I voted Dissatisfied but that is more about the quantity of GOOD content. I'd be fine with less books overall if it meant more high quality content that I actually cared to use

There are some (very few, but they do exist) mechanics in the game that impact depend on character alignment. With Rules As Written these mechanics are so rare that your route of ignoring alignment would not ever miss much, but I also try to homebrew in mechanics that depend on alignment, to...

Agreed let's not derail any further. The relevant point to the thread is that whether people love/hate WotC doesn't seem to have any predictive bearing on whether they take issue with the Kobold Press article

If you have a negative opinion of something then it is offensive to you, that's what the word means. You don't need to be angered, outraged, or have any emotional response to be offended.

Used properly, Alignment doesn't lead to anything, it is the result of character behaviors. Players play their characters however they want, and then Alignment is just a label to describe the actions that they take. I think the OP's suggested system could be really fun for the right group of...

I could see a good argument for Monks, but not the rest. Certainly at least for Kensei subclass, I'm sure that subclass will have weapon masteries if it gets updated

On the flipside I have bought the WotC versions of the PHB and DMG and I don't think the article was problematic in any way. I think reactions to the Kobold Press article are much more based on one's propensity to be offended than on one's support/hatred for WotC