Search results

They really are leaning heavy into the cartoon. Too bad for them that I have zero nostalgia for it--the only episode I've ever seen is this brilliant reworking:

Things I've Changed: Chapter 1 My players are currently in the High Hall of Elturel in chapter 2. I thought I'd make a post about things I've changed. Some of these were my own idea and some I got from suggestions I found online or in supplements. Most of my PCs are native to Baldur's Gate and...

We're back to the "multiple definitions of railroad" problem, which always comes up when that term enters discussion. Some people use it to mean a linear campaign where one event leads to another and if the players try to wander "over there" and explore what's off the edge of the map, they miss...

Yeah, well. I'm already on record as being a heretic about other things that I'm assured are "integral to 5E design," so I guess we'll just have to add this to the list.

I can honestly say that the damage numbers are so far down on my list of things I enjoy about D&D as to be virtually nonexistent.

Damn, you mean I've been having ersatz fun all this time? I've gotta learn to get better at telling the real stuff from the forgeries. :(

A lot of people seem to love it, but the people who do love it seem to be the ones looking to replicate an OSR-style "simple, gritty, and deadly" type game. That may or may not be what the OP is looking for.

Is there a reason you can't just use the 2014 rules?

Are you saying Gygaxian Purple Prose is perforce the antithesis of weal?

The module tells the DM to "Roll dice behind the screen and frown.” That is meant to imply to the players that the monster succeeded on some kind of secret saving throw, suggesting that it might fail on a future attempt (even with the same roll from the players). Still, if the module writers...

In that video, it's blatantly obvious to everyone in the room, including the kid, that the people in charge are interfering. The advice in the module is supposed to make it look like a legit miss. What I'm hearing from you is that it is the fact that the advice expects the DM to hide the truth...

Isn't it basically just the same as Legendary Resistance? Is it the inability to make the item work on the first hit that bothers you, or the fact that the module instructs DMs to hide what they're doing?

There's always (IMO) been a healthy amount of Robin Hood mixed in with the Ranger archetype, and he certainly has roguish tendencies.

(never mind)

On the other hand, it can't report until it gets back, as it doesn't have the "see through your familiar's eyes" telepathic link. You also have to speak to it verbally or at least in whispers, which could interfere with trying to stay hidden.

Such a great setting. I understand why it's never been updated--and yes, a lot of it is system-agnostic--but I'm still bummed that it's dormant, if only because it deserves to be better known.

Thanks for the suggestions, everyone! I think I've decided to treat the teapot as a magic item (with charges) and will balance it by giving similarly powerful magic items to other party members. Someone pointed me to this resource, which will also be handy...

I guess that's fair, but still, bummer.

Why is it the "final" book?

Didn't the original Starter Set come with pregen characters? I don't have mine handy right now, but I could swear it did. Or do you just think the ones from the Essentials Kit were better?