Search results

Yes. You explicitly are. I stated as much. I was explicit the entire time that I was referring to the differentiation of Martial characters being well represented in their gameplay mechanics while for Spellcasters (And specifically the Psion, Sorcerer, and Wizard) it wasn't really different at...

Except Psionics is also Magic. They use the word magic over and over and over and over again. The Weave is also required to cast Cleric and Druid Spells, Paladin Spells, Warlock Spells. So "Defiling" can't have any kind of effect on the Weave for Arcane Spellcasters (Wizards, Warlocks, Bards...

And with the same system they do it all differently. Monks hit a whole lot of times and move around a lot. Rogues hit very few times but REALLY HARD and move around a lot or do it at range. Fighters and Barbarians tend to be the most alike, wading into combat, but where the Fighter often relies...

"One D&D" is both 2014 and 2024 together. And in 2014 they included this: The Weave of Magic The worlds within the D&D multiverse are magical places. All existence is suffused with magical power, and potential energy lies untapped in every rock, stream, and living creature, and even in the air...

That is a bald faced lie! Pecos Bill is happily married to Slue-foot Sue! She road a catfish down the Rio Grande while shooting clouds out of the sky with a pair of pistols!

Which is why I included the caveat in parentheses. I'm referring to the class identities being unique and well represented in the system, not overall mechanical power.

Not really? Folk Culture has long been a part of American cultures and subcultures. It just tends to be more regional than national 'cause America is freaking big, geographically, as far as nations go. And people in Appalachia don't really identify with the folk cultures in the Midwest or...

Oh, I don't doubt subclasses make a difference. They make a difference for the Fighter, too. Or the Barbarian. And provide distinctly different combat styles and goals for the Monk and Rogue, as well. But on their face, the -baseline- Barbarian, Fighter, Monk, and Rogue all fight differently...

They are. Yup. This is one of the hurdles they have to jump, and would've had to jump when it was the Mystic. I'm not saying it's insurmountable. Just that it's a problem. As far as the Weave, that was more about how they've made ALL MAGIC (including Psionic 'Magic') dependent on the presence...

So your position is a broad agreement with the design issues with the addition of a lack of time to focus on Dark Sun and a retreat into the issue of slavery being a thing in the setting. 'Kay. This is a position that I can understand and engage with. And I don't think any of it is...

Tall tales, myths, and legends are all told in the same way. The protagonist faces some quasi-impossible challenge and through a quirk of their birth or some impossibly powerful skill accomplishes the task anyway. Whether that's Hercules, Pecos Bill, Gilgamesh, or the Monkey King. They only...

Once again: Make an argument as to what is the actual cause, rather than just trying to pick apart my arguments and posts. I'm not interested in a debate or discussion where one person forms an argument to present a proposition and the other person spends their time trying to tear apart that...

A Fighter, a Rogue, a Monk, and a Barbarian are all Martial characters. They move and they hit things. That's their baseline mechanic. But HOW they move and hit things tells a story that gets you invested into a specific character fantasy. Rogues do a lot more moving and ranged attacking...

Also the misogyny of Chameleon. A woman who is dumb and beautiful, plain and moderately intelligent, or ugly and brilliant, based on a monthly cycle. And how Bink would get her pregnant while she was beautiful and then have to suffer the rest of the time when she was pissed at him for tricking...

D&D has a lot of thieves guilds. But I'm talking about the Russian Mob complete with the slav squat and track suits. I'm talking Dominic Toretto pealing squealing donuts in Silverymoon. This Strawman was meant to be a COMPLETE one. Not a question of allegorical connection or general gesture...

Your point is that it's not a shot in the dark because some nebulous group of people which may or may not include this fanbase likes Post Apocalyptic TV and Moves. Which is just as valid an argument for instead making OneD&D Modern... Which is really unlikely to happen. Possibly less unlikely...

Most started with 5e. Some refuse to learn about new content. And those people don't buy books. And thus WotC doesn't care what they think because they won't buy anything WotC puts out. And that some is smaller than "Most" or "All". The Pre3e fans mostly ditched 3e. And 4e. And 5e. And their...

You responded to "There's no guarantee that the specific playerbase of this game, who have taken to it in the very narrow manner it has been presented" with "Post apocalyptic movies and shows have been hits!" As if that means a single thing relative to the point that I made. You know what else...

I'd rather have a Psion than not have a Psion in 5e D&D. However I'll use the survey to voice my preference for different mechanics while still judging the class's mechanics on the design goals. My opinion, like many, will be ignored and I'm okay with that.