Search results

Gawds I hated Taladas... I don't know how differently i can say it: as a lifelong fan of D&D, I LIKE it when there is something official from D&D that gets me excited. That is the whole motivation.

That is what The Hunt For Golem is.

Yeah, flashback city.

I don't care for campaign length adventures or splatbooks, so there isn't much else WotC could put out besides a setting that WOULD excite me. I suppose a really cool focused monster book like Fizban's (maybe for the fae, or perhaps demons and devils) might get me going. But remember this thread...

It is fine if you don't pay for them. ;)

I linked the definition -- and you quoted that post where I linked it. "Had no idea" feels a little bit disingenuous since we know you at least acknowledged the definition, but chose to ignore it in order to continue an argument only you were having. Even after I defined it for you multiple...

Right. Someone asked what I thought was missing, that's all.

That seems extra silly considering those actors are 25 odd years older than when those movies were filmed. Just do it as a sequel. I will never understand the need to constantly return to the same well over and over. but we have talked about this with regards to D&D settings, so...

What can I say? You are being obtuse.

15 for me. Man, 35 was a GREAT age.

If you reject the terminology, there really is not anything to talk about, is there?

I don't think that matters. After all, they are making Dark Sun and Swords and Sandals peaked more like 70 years ago.

Aren't the later Mistborn books basically noir second world urban fantasy?

Other reports suggest this film is set well after the Return of the King and folds in elements of Return of the Shadow. So Tom will appear in a sequel to LotR, if the reports hold.

Because a key defining feature of "Urban Fantasy" the genre is that it is set in the contemporary world (or a second world very, very close to it). I don't quite understand what the confusion is.

It is so strange that some folks want to fight against the simplest reason: it is fun to be excited for official D&D things.

The genre terms are well established. That doesn't mean there aren't fuzzy line or corner cases, but you having an internal, personal definition based on your understanding of the words does not have any impact on the existence or viability of the genre terminology. I have no idea what you mean...

Sure. They "could." But that would also mean reviving d20 Modern (or make a 5E Modern or whatever). That all sounds much less likely than even the high unliklihood of them doing a Urban Fantasy setting at all. I only brought it up because someone asked what fantasy subgenres were not covered by...

I have not looked deeply into it, but based on the campaign page, it seems so. I think D&D could have a setting like that. I personally wouldn't do 2026 modern, but maybe 1926 modern.

I find it very strange that folks don't know what urban fantasy is in 2026. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Urban_fantasy