Search results

This is actually not how efficient frontiers work at all. There is no what you feel it should be, it is a data driven line.

I dislike metacurrency conceptually but find that some level of it is needed to practically evoke certain themes.

That’s be about like Taco Bell copyrighting the word taco.

First of all thanks for the explanation. Not many voting that way have commented on their vote. My answers, in no particular order: 1. As you already acknowledged such data doesn't exist. I don't believe some theoretical but unachievable methodology can make any analysis not very useful. 2...

Why hasn’t anyone taken up the user name “The Forge” Someone is missing prime time gold

To be fair, Nividia should have better vetted their initial images for weird stuff that their AI tech would inevitably be blamed for. But yea, assuming these are legit images then most if not all the weird crap wasn’t being caused by DLSS5.

There were quite a few votes for 'what is this'. So maybe it's a good time to elaborate a bit on what it is. Currently I pick some builds, compute the dpr and effective hp. I then plot those. What the graphical position of the points tells you is that points higher have better DPR's than...

I really don't have a favorite. I take TWF if I want to dual wield. I take Dueling if i want to sword and shield. I take Defense or Blind Fighting if using a 2 handed weapon. I take archery if using a bow. I think protection is theoretically the most interesting, but also really hurts sword...

After reviewing this context I am done with this particular conversation.

Not tried that. Might be interesting. Or probably better would be copying the response and asking for an accuracy check from a different LLM.

Statements like these are funny (I know not yours). You either save money when becoming more efficient by firing people or not hiring additional ones. There's no other monetary 'savings' to efficiency.

Then no worries. I assure you that the actual production will contain clarity on how everything is being calculated. I kind of thought that went without saying for something like this. But I'm just as happy to make that explicit.

What exactly do you mean by 'how scientific it is' and 'treated as a scientific paper'?

It's an example, not a final product. Methodology was intentionally left out as the particular methodology (still a work in progress) doesn't determine whether a graphical picture like that is useful/interesting to you.

Certainly that's an option. I notice you can spot alot that's just a bit off with a bit of critical thinking and whatever 'facts/analysis' it is telling you. But again, it really depends on what you are going to use the information you are getting from it for. Not all information for all...

Right, because there are no strategies for evaluating the accuracy of information an LLM gives... ;)

Let's compare like and like though. If I'm not using chat gpt then I'm googling in order to visit random websites for my information which isn't particularly great when it comes to finding accurate specific information about a topic. Generally it directs you to reddit or the like anyways...

I miss those days. Biggest worries were the unending popups that would plague certain sites.