Search results

Thanks guys! Very generous of you to go into so much detail. After studying the PHB I've decided to to the ranger 2/ and then fighter from then on. TWF machetes, weapon finesse (get high Dex) and then take feats like weapon focus/specialilsation, improved TWF and eventually improved crit. (lots...

Thanks guys! Very generous of you to go into so much detail. After studying the PHB I've decided to to the ranger 2/ and then fighter from then on. TWF machetes, weapon finesse (get high Dex) and then take feats like weapon focus/specialilsation, improved TWF and eventually improved crit. (lots...

I wouldn't buy the book - though I do like the idea of using some 'adult' themes in a campaign - creating ties and tensions between NPC's and NPC's or between NPC's and PC's - or as a part of part of a crime context. I think developing sex-related rules is a bit corny though (even if they...

Rowport, you're right - I do want to play a ranger in the classic style, but I have to develop the kick-ass aspect of his abilities (because the party needs a fighter, and because another player has already 'reserved' a sneaky ranger). I don't want to sacrifice the personality I've already...

Hi, We'll be playing 3.5. Problem is, I'm really sold on the idea of the rural, sneaky resourceful guy. Can a fighter in light armour and two machete's (or a quaterstaff) and a background in wilderness warfare (i.e., level 1 ranger) be any good in 3.5, or is he just a fool?

Srd Why have WOTC, or D20, or Hasbro - or who whoever it is - decided to put abstracts of their rules into the public domain? What's the rationale behind it? In what way do they hope to benefit? Could someone explain to me what SRD all about. thanks

Hi, I'm not very familiar with D&D rules so I'm not sure if I'm making a mistake. Situation is - I'm starting a game and want to play a ranger - but someone in the game's already got one and I've been 'encorouged' to play a fighter (cos there's none in the party). Problem is I have a definite...