Search results

I don’t know about predicting the future, but I like a lot of what Free League does.

I’m for it, but I’d prefer the Lawful/Chaotic paradigm to the Good/Evil one.

I always had the feeling 5E was trying to downplay the system mastery elements of 3-4E. Are you sure Wizards cares whether stats are balanced? This observation is mostly in the context of the OP’s suggestion that the next edition must “fix” stats.

This sounds like a cop out answer, but of course it’s going to depend on what players want out of a game. Current default D&D assumptions are the gonzo fantasy that, to me, feels like a mashup of comic superheroes and Chinese mystical kung fu. For that setting, restrictions would be absurd...

Probably railroad versus sandbox is better applied to GMing style than published adventures, if one is being picky. But I assumed the context of a published adventure is how much support it gives for going off the rails. A module that has a very linear plot and assumes players will make certain...

This scenario doesn't ring true to me. A gamer encountering a setting for the first time will be interested depending on their personal biases. Some gamers love world settings; this has been amply proven over the years and the RPG as a genre probably wouldn't have lasted without such interests...

Don’t hate on the Hill Giant. It’s the classic giant of fairytales!

I agree. And FR is basically the only setting used for all D&D computer games and board games, making it even more likely that less entrenched RPG fans know it to the exclusion of all other settings. And to the Dark Sun discussion, really? Surely this has gone way past tangency to the topic of FR.

Cloud Giant 21 Ettin 17 Fire Giant 31 Frost Giant 26 Hill Giant 25

If one can be pragmatic and ignore that MtG is another brand owned by WotC, I think many MtG planes have tremendous creative value. It's actually a blessing that they are picking some highlights to bring to D&D. There are entire creative writing teams and enormous artistic talent poured into...

To me, this is a rabbit hole that benefits very little from delving into. Some people like different damage type per weapon (whether traditional style or 13th Age style), others might enjoy reducing all weapons to a d6. But there is no meaningful reduction in complexity for the latter. Is...

Cloud Giant 25 Cyclops 4 Ettin 23 Fire Giant 30 Frost Giant 31 Hill Giant 28

Cloud Giant 25 Cyclops 14 Ettin 23 Fire Giant 37 Frost Giant 31 Hill Giant 27

I don’t see where the correction was needed.

The Beyonder is a more pure plot element. Q shows far more fallibility (is one of many in his race, is stripped of his powers at one point, etc). Q has more character development, but clearly the Beyonder in this face off.

rczarnak's votes got lost when Tazawa posted at the same time (posts #286 and #287). rczarnak upvoted Fire Giant and downvoted Cyclops. Totals should currently be: Cloud Giant 28 Cyclops 27 Ettin 28 Fire Giant 31 Frost Giant 32 Hill Giant 32

None can stand before Dormammu. Prepare to be overrun by Mindless Ones.

Cloud Giant 31 Cyclops 27 Ettin 31 Fire Giant 31 Fire Giant Dreadnought 2 Frost Giant 30 Guardian Giant 9 Hill Giant 31

I think costs are a weak spot of the 4E design in general. They removed so much non-combat rules bloat, so why did they leave in the weird GP economy of buying magic items and then try to bolt things like rituals onto it? Fixing the system to use resource checks based on character level and...

Cloud Giant 33 Cloud Giant Smiling One 6 Cyclops 26 Ettin 29 Fire Giant 29 Fire Giant Dreadnought 16 Fog Giant 16 Frost Giant 29 Guardian Giant 13 Hill Giant 31 Ice Troll 7