Search results

No one else seems to be talking about this, so I thought I'd give it a go. I thought it was interesting that their were only 7 spell levels for the wizard and cleric in the play test. Now, I don't know if that aspect of the game is still up for discussion, but I kinda like the idea; fewer spell...

Whether we do so professionally or as an amateur, I suspect that a good number of us in this community have written and published RPG material before; whole games or just adventures. Still others are serious house-rulers, who tweak and adjust games so much that new material from the same...

No, seriously! The core of the game should be designed for inebriated 20-something adult males who want to bash stuff and don't want to think about mechanics. Not the art or adventures - we don't need a testosterone filled romp through a bordello of Succubi - I'm talking about the mechanics...

Sooo... In 1st/2nd edition, humans had unlimited potential (level-wise). In 3rd edition, humans had an extra feat and extra skill points, and "any" as a favored class. In Pathfinder, humans received everything they did in 3rd edition, and a +2 to any one stat. In 4th edition (as I understand...

How do you actually think about hit points in the middle of a game; is hit point loss a matter of endurance or real physical damage?

Is it just me, or does the rules given in the play test material regarding Hit Points, Hit Dice, Healing, and Constitution all seem a little... off? It isn't that I expect perfection out of the gate, but it doesn't seem well thought out either. Take Constitution's effect on rolled hit-points...

I fully expect that the core of the next edition will be stripped-down simple. What does this mean for most players? That it will be only slightly more complicated that flipping a coin. I have to wonder if our focus on the core of the game is a little misplaced; perhaps instead of discussing...