Search results

Playee kinda dumped strength a bit (it's 16). Real game would have been18 or 20 before the item turned up. Probably shoukd have said no. It's not gonna be a long term thing so care factor was low. Could have been worse. Coukd gave asked for 25 strength one.

I would just leave tbh. DMs doing stupid rules changed at will sucks the fun out of a game. Games probably gonna crater anyway. RTFR basically. Changing rules are fine ad Hoc eh I'll pass.

Pathfinder had same artist as 4E. It was just another punch in the love spuds. Generally not a fan of Pathfinder art well WAR.

I've played 1-19 once circle 95/96. Level 1-13 2015 Random one shots/short games 20-30.

Yeah I'm thinking if this stat was similar back in the day all those XYZ 5/PrC2/PrC1/PrC3 type builds were essentially theory crafting. I did have suspicions in 2002 after watching casuals play vs online assumptions. And the rapid death of 4E. Fixed problems most groups won't see. 3.x...

I've thought of something similar. Take 5E, rewrite the classes and 3.5 levels of healing overnight ( 1/hp per level iirc).

So I've got a new player joining at level 10. He's experienced and showed me his character sheet etc. He needed some magic items. I said wishlist very rare, two rares and not to worried about uncommonss. Think I vetoed a rod but okayed a frost brand or belt of giant strength 23. Of course he...

Did tgey ever revise the adventure after they revised the building rules in Ultimste Campaigns iirc? I mine KM a lot recent using Olegs as a start location.

Yeah regular play and fast leveling. I try for 4 other sessions a level but are heading things up to hit 12 which is end of campaign. We probably do about 26 sessions a year maybe 20 due to reasons you listed.

Well this one here it seems most here don't like it. Each edition usually has hit and miss art. I usually don't complain to much because of that fact. 5.5 has more hits than dud in say the MM. The first pictures fairly bad though imho. I've seen better AI art. There's also a lot of...

Makes sense it's a fairly direct comparison. Lathendar basically tge Sun god most editions. Technically Amaunator who may be Lathendar and no one cares about him anyway.

Are you familiar with the Faith's and Avatars book? There is an old list of the 20 most prominent kids. Nothings really changed except Tiamat and Lolth probably need to be added. Dead 3 are classic villain and as well. FR Adventures Auril Azuth Besheba Chauntea Lyrics Deneir Eldath Good...

It's really bad ymmv of course. Generally i don't comment to much about art as it's subjective. Hard sell for this lot though. Wel the first one anyway. Second ones better.

Wouldn't you want the 20 that map to Theros piety system the best? The pantheon is in a state of flux atm. Eg Amaunator/Lathendar may be same deity and the dead 3 are essentially demigods now. You want me to map the Theros one to FR equivalent?

10,211,12 is usually where we get to. It's capstone stuff for me.

I'm thinking of buying the pocket edition of RotRL for use with 5.5. I can convert easily enough. What other 1E APs were compiled into a single book and are readily available still?

Few years back WotC released that number from Beyond. 10% make it to 10, 1% epic tier. Older editions not sure but TSR alumni are on record saying higher level stuff didn't sell well. There was a big drop off in BE and CMI apparently for example. This raises interesting questions about...

Wari and Tiwanaku sound about right. And Chimu as a contemporary rival until Inca won. I was reading wiki on Waru iirc about a month ago.

They also had precursor civilizations. Forget the names but they had one before them and a precursor to the precursor.

New core books art was ok or not worth complaining about. I like my alt art versions of them especially the MM. Ymmv but these new ones are terrible. It's not a 5.0 was better or 5.5 sucks or D&D is doomed.