Search results

Thanks for the replies thus far. Oofta, yea, that DMG entry, as well as the Druid description on the DM call is what has me looking to see what others are doing. I listed rings and cloaks as examples, but there's a whole slew of items this could apply to. Amulets for example. A wolf could...

How do you determine what magic items a druid can/cannot use when in wildshape form? Ring and cloaks for example? Do you allow wolves and dire bears to were such items? Just curious on how people are ruling this. Thanks!

Agreed. And that is pretty much the way I'll be running it.

Thanks guys, always nice to bounce these ideas off DMs without a "vested interest" as a player. I think I am going with option A then and here's why... It's not "just a curse". It's a regional effect. If we look at Remove Curse, paraphrased..... At your touch, all curses affecting one...

You know, I agree with this thought, in concept. BUT, where's the danger in taking a mummy lords treasure if a 3rd level spell can negate the curse just like any other curse?

Here's a question...How does the Spell Remove Curse work on a person who is affected by a mummy lords cursed treasure? I can see a few possibilities... A. The spell acts as described. It allows the the player/victim to discard the treasure/item (and thus curse whomever picks it up next)? B...

Thanks for the feedback thus far. It sounds like you all are as nasty minded as I am, hee, hee!!!

So the mummy lord (p.228/229, MM) cannot be "permanently destroyed" unless it heart is destroyed. Otherwise they raise up again in 24 hours at full strength. Question...how would you DMs out there handle any mummy's curse on any treasure found in the mummies tomb if the mummy is "destroyed"...

Well, that kinda sums it up then, eh. ;o)

Hey Thanks for the info. I really liked that rangers option. Pretty sweet!

Hey All, I'm just curious if anyone has been using any alternate builds for the ranger and if so, what has worked and what hasn't? What about the one published in the Unearthed Arcana article? Has anyone used that? Thoughts on it?

Conjure Animal (or Fey, or Elemental, etc. etc.) The spell states that the beasts summoned have to be brought up within range of the spell. After that, the beasts disappear when the spell goes inactive or they're reduced to zero hit points. It doesn't say anything about them being...

Actually, this is really the driving point behind what I am doing. Coming up with a system to differentiate different NPCs of the same type from one another. The PC side, I'm really not as concerned with.

Im not as happy with this one either, but it'll work (and I can still change it up)

Thanks for the kind words...I attempted one for Clerics as well...let me know what you think Cleric Acolyte Oblate Curate Priest Archpriest Prelate Hierarch Patriarch Pontif

Actually I think I came up with something. I looked at the wizards spell progression and every level they get a new level spell slot, I assigned a title. So here we go... 1-2 Novice 3-4 Apprentice 5-6 Journeyman 7-8 Adept 9-10 Magus 11-12 High Magus 13-14 Master 15-16 Grandmaster...

Yea, I found that as well, but the wizard titles no longer make sense considering we have schools of magic that cover those titles (not based upon rank) and we also have sorcerer and warlock classes now.

Is there a good list somewhere of title for classes by level (or level range)? Like 1-3 Apprentice 4-6, Adept, etc? Specifically, I'm looking for titles for wizards, but clerics would be helpful as well. Thanks

Awesome, thanks!

I like that idea was well. That works really well for "simplicity sake".