Search results

So, I'm not sure where you'd like to receive feedback, but I had to get my voice out regarding my first impressions. I heavily dislike the O5e Artificer. I am in love with the one presented in this document from the first feature. Without divulging too much information, Spell Inventions are...

Vulnerability, Resistance, Immunity.

Well, it's a multiclass, but it's not complex synergistically beyond making a single choice in your multiclass' feature when given the option. I posted it here: Level Up (A5E) - Silly powerbuilds

Sitting back down to finish P1 and start P2 finally, and I think I'll try to implement the Defenses; DCs can stay alongside maneuvers/spells. Thinking this is gonna be how I do it, restrained as it is: EDIT: oh, expertise on the conditions. EDIT 2: Added fixed example.

Yeah, I was personally hoping to come across genasi planetouched options on my first read.

Yeah, I hope my enunciation didn't come off as too serious in kind. I'm just concerned in the event that you're correct in motive; the solution to people focusing on one thing when it's the only option isn't to make it weaker to discourage usage, it's to implement alternatives. Granted, the Roc...

It was the only thing they polymorphed into because it was the only thing you could polymorph into at higher levels. There are no beast-type monsters in O5e D&D of equal or higher CR outside of ones added via adventure books, so once you hit level 8 you had zero progression after the T-Rex...

The point being made was that you're presenting it as though having full plate as a wizard is min/maxing, when it's more or less... just something you can do.

The Adzerker REQUIREMENTS At least Level 11 Adept- Paralyzing Strike, Pressure Point Secrets, Additional Attack At least Level 2 Berserker- Relentless Attack Greatclub To make this work, the idea is to use your unarmed strikes before your greatclub to inflict paralysis, but it's theoretically...

Heh.

Well, were it O5e I'd agree, but with Combat Maneuvers it's going to have to be at least a 2-page regardless of class.

That is a great idea that I hadn't considered (despite the other minimalist sheets including it, yes); I think I'll word it as 'DC / Bonus' if I can't increase the field to fit the full text in. I have two reasons for that design choice. First is that tool proficiencies were originally appended...

Update time- I've more or less finished the first page of my character sheet; and I feel now is a proper time to detail some of my additions compared to niklinna and Masha's sheets: A more compact view. AC has multiple fields to cover armored/unarmored/shield-bearing armor classes, along with a...

I feel that RAI it was meant to be 1, but RAW it's 2. 'Reshape the fraying magic' sounds as if it were salvaging it, but it says the new spell has to 'use a spell slot'. If it was intended to be cast with the same slot, I'd word it as "[...] so long as the spell being cast would use a spell slot...

I see what you did there.

So... I decided to make my own sheet from scratch, since I feel like there's a lot of dead space that could be used more efficiently here. It's compact enough that I have dead space of my own trying to figure out what else I can fit in the center after Supply's added; probably going to be...

Because it's granting a static application from a variable. You can have a d4, d6, or d8 (and d10/d12 if you work for it) as your expertise die that increases odds, but regardless of this it grants a binary +3 to passives? I'm naturally going to question if that was intended. Fair enough...