Search results

Which version is that? I don't think I have any errata to the 4e stealth rules, just the original.

That was a question about Dispel Magic, I did read that. I just didn't make the connection that you did. However, think that is specific to what Dispel Magic affects. There are many things that are not noted as magical (dragon and beholder flight for example), but they are magical (during 2014...

So, Are You Being Served?!

Can you point me to the section where this is clarified? I looked for it, but couldn't find it.

It seemed to me that @MazzelDazzle only wanted the AI art because of the, IMO, misguided thought that it fulfilled UK's vision more authentically. I seriously doubt that, know how AI images work and knowing a little bit about UK.

No wanting to answer for @Upper_Krust , but I think it is really, really hard to get your true intent with AI images. IME, you eventually have to accept something that is not quite correct with AI. So I would guess, if you truly want UK's intent, then it should be commissioned art. That gives UK...

Are the chromatic and metallic dragons completely gone from PF2 or just de-emphasized?

Quartershots Book II - Lairs & Labyrinths looks interesting. I may have to check that out. Thank you for the tip!

Thank you for the help! Ok, now that I have looked at them, what are people saying about the new designs (visual - not mechanics)? When WotC changed the dragon designs for 2024 there was a lot of buzz (positive and negative). I really haven't heard any buzz on the PF2e dragons. Do people like...

Personally, I don't think he is arguing against your experience, he is arguing against your explanation of your experience.

I don't feel it - but I am glad it moves you!

Well that is obviously subjective. I get no emotional punch from his work and never did. The basic rulebook cover, IMO, feels very stiff and emotionless. Pretty much the opposite of how you see his work! I really don't like Elmore's dragon in the read box cover, but that image has much more...

Isn't storyline text and art about inspiration? I realize they can go both ways, but that is how it generally works for me: mechanics & storyline = text inspiration = art

I am not a PF2 person, but I always support more books on dragons! Is there a good visual reference for the PF2e dragons? I really appreciated WotC effort to redesign their chromatics, but haven't paid as much attention the PF2e changes. Do they have images on the Archives?

Question: would you back if there was an option to get a full color version with AI art (but replaced with commissioned art as stretch goals are funded)? So you have following, depending on your pledge: BW art version with all commissioned art. Full color version with commissioned art and AI...

Love that sketch! If that artist is doing the BW version - I am all in! That would be fantastic. Then maybe stretch goals for color versions / replacement. Heck, I might even want both!

Thank you for responding, but to did my other posts I quoted not help clarify my viewpoint? Is it that one unclarity sours the whole intent? I can understand that and try to be more explicit / clear with my posts - but it is difficult not to slip up! Also, I agree I didn't discuss my "feelings"...

Monsters and NPC obviously target the PCs all the time. But, from my perspective, that is not "me" it is the natural flow of the game world and the PCs actions. The issue I have with your soft/hard move is that it is, IMO, a meta currency (player vs DM)* and not a game consequence (PC vs NPC)...

Can someone clarify to me why the magic items and the tough feat need to be in the SRD? How does their inclusion help 3PP create new content? Is it simply so you can copy it into your content? I am honestly trying to understand.

I am not really familiar with soft and hard moves, but this just seems to adversarial for my tastes. I am never trying to go against my PCs and would not like feeling I had to do that to justify giving them a success. It gets back to the idea of: don't lend money to a friend unless you truly...