100x100 Avatars?

[Mark]

... but its hard to get something to look right at that size.

I wouldn't be makin' fun of the size of a gnome if I were you, mister...

 

[Brother Shatterstone]

I wouldn't be makin' fun of the size of a gnome if I were you, mister...

Oh I got gnomed today long before this post went up...

 

[andargor]

We'll discuss it!

Any progress on your discussion?

Andargor

 

[andargor]

We'll discuss it!

By now, you should have had your quarterly meeting to discuss important subjects such as this.

So, what's the verdict? IMVHO, this is a no-brainer...

Andargor

 

[Gez]

It has been decided that avatars would now be displayed on top, like at RPG.net, and that maximum dimensions would now be 500x10. They call it, "avabanner".

Cheers!

 

[Piratecat]

The mods are generally opposed to 100 x 100 avatars, so I don't expect it to change. If it does, I'll let you know!

 

[Staffan]

That's a shame. It's not like there isn't space for it - the current avatars take up less than half the width of the "poster sidebar" (where poster handle, avatar, post count and such are displayed). At least on my computer, though I use a resolution that might be higher than most do.

 

[Darth K'Trava]

And especially since avatars like mine are BIGGER than 100x100, I'm sure.

If we could have custom-made ones that are the same size, but still be small file sizes, it'd be cool.

 

[Dimwhit]

And especially since avatars like mine are BIGGER than 100x100, I'm sure.

If we could have custom-made ones that are the same size, but still be small file sizes, it'd be cool.

Yep, yours is 64x120.

It's just the mods preference to now allow uploads of 100x100 avatars, since the forum can obviously handle them with no adverse effects (or is it affects?). But that's cool. That's why they're the mods.

 

[Greylock]

Goodness. All this talk of height and width. Ya'll are getting out the rulers now.

please disregard my wee 50x50. please.