2005 D&D Monsters Calendar

[Dragon-Slayer]

I had seen this calendar and was not impressed at all. The pictures are nothing we haven't seen before and the presentation looked a bit bland. At the price I would rather get a Luis Royo or Simon Bisley over this offering. I think Wizards could have done much better than this. Maybe a Wayne Reynolds/Sam Wood/Todd Lockwood selection would have caught my eye. To each their own.

 

[cybertalus]

I had seen this calendar and was not impressed at all. The pictures are nothing we haven't seen before and the presentation looked a bit bland. At the price I would rather get a Luis Royo or Simon Bisley over this offering. I think Wizards could have done much better than this. Maybe a Wayne Reynolds/Sam Wood/Todd Lockwood selection would have caught my eye. To each their own.

Granted it's not the best-looking calendar ever published. However, I was glad to see a D&D calendar being published, as it's been ages since there's been one available at all. Even though I'm ambivalent about the look of the thing, I'm tempted to buy two or three copies just to increase the chances that there's another one published next year.

 

[cybertalus]

I had seen this calendar and was not impressed at all. The pictures are nothing we haven't seen before and the presentation looked a bit bland. At the price I would rather get a Luis Royo or Simon Bisley over this offering. I think Wizards could have done much better than this. Maybe a Wayne Reynolds/Sam Wood/Todd Lockwood selection would have caught my eye. To each their own.

Granted it's not the best-looking calendar ever published. However, I was glad to see a D&D calendar being published, as it's been ages since there's been one available at all. Even though I'm ambivalent about the look of the thing, I'm tempted to buy two or three copies just to increase the chances that there's another one published next year.

 

[cybertalus]

I had seen this calendar and was not impressed at all. The pictures are nothing we haven't seen before and the presentation looked a bit bland. At the price I would rather get a Luis Royo or Simon Bisley over this offering. I think Wizards could have done much better than this. Maybe a Wayne Reynolds/Sam Wood/Todd Lockwood selection would have caught my eye. To each their own.

Granted it's not the best-looking calendar ever published. However, I was glad to see a D&D calendar being published, as it's been ages since there's been one available at all. Even though I'm ambivalent about the look of the thing, I'm tempted to buy two or three copies just to increase the chances that there's another one published next year.

 

[Amendria]

Wow, great find. I guess I'll have to have two calendars next year.
(I already bought a Carolina Places one. Quite lovely)

 

[Dragon-Slayer]

Granted it's not the best-looking calendar ever published. However, I was glad to see a D&D calendar being published, as it's been ages since there's been one available at all. Even though I'm ambivalent about the look of the thing, I'm tempted to buy two or three copies just to increase the chances that there's another one published next year.

While I see your reasoning here, I would rather not buy the DnD calendar for fear it would encourage Wizards to crank out more of the same in the future. WotC should take a hint from Games Workshop and make calendars like theirs (at least in my opinion). I would rather buy a calendar I like than encourage a mediocre offering to continue next year.