I think the hatred for the PHB2 is greatly overrated: there are a few posters who really dislike the book, but on the whole it has been one of the best received books WotC has put out in the last two years.MerricB said:I'm amazed PHB2 is still there, given all the hate it's have.
Evilhalfling said:No one speaking out against dragon magic? mediocre niche book that it was.
SteveC said:I think the hatred for the PHB2 is greatly overrated: there are a few posters who really dislike the book, but on the whole it has been one of the best received books WotC has put out in the last two years.
Hmmmm...players begging to play classes from the book. Could be just me, but isn't that the sort of thing that should be considered good about a book? (Unless, of course, they are all the sort of players who always try to play the unbalanced, powerful tripe).Psion said:...and so far I have had to deal with multiple players practically begging to play classes from the book.
Glyfair said:Hmmmm...players begging to play classes from the book. Could be just me, but isn't that the sort of thing that should be considered good about a book?
Glyfair said:It's interesting that Faiths of Eberron is fighting with Dragon Magic to be voted off, but I've seen no complaints about it at all in this thread (not even a straight "it sucks").
Psion said:From a DM perspective, if the DM doesn't want the classes in his game, no.
I don't particularly like it myself. I do, however, like all the others (the Dragon Shaman being a borderline like, but it fits well in my Eberron game).I even think, after a little analysis, the knight is actually not a very good class.
Glyfair said:I still don't see how that makes it a bad book. DM doesn't want new classes in him game & the players do.
Yeah, I thought that was a little darky-horsey...Glyfair said:It's interesting that Faiths of Eberron is fighting with Dragon Magic to be voted off, but I've seen no complaints about it at all in this thread (not even a straight "it sucks").