drnuncheon
Explorer
Re: Errata I noticed, some sent to Kim
To avoid potential embarassment:
Kim Mohan is a guy.
J
theskees said:
To avoid potential embarassment:
Kim Mohan is a guy.
J
-
The VOIDRUNNER'S CODEX is coming! Explore new worlds, fight oppressive empires, fend off fearsome aliens, and wield deadly psionics with this comprehensive boxed set expansion for 5E and A5E!
D&D 3E/3.5 3.5 Errata Reporting
- Thread starter Olgar Shiverstone
- Start date
Wippit Guud
First Post
Forget I posted this
Last edited:
Elder-Basilisk
First Post
This is the SRD rather than the DMG but I suspect the error is there too.
Magic Items IV, page 10 lists the cost of a bless weapon scroll at 100gp. Since the caster level of a fourth level paladin is only two, that should be 50gp instead. (And it would then give a reason to have scrolls of bless weapon instead of the more generally useful oil of bless weapon which is also listed at 100gp).
Magic Items IV, page 10 lists the cost of a bless weapon scroll at 100gp. Since the caster level of a fourth level paladin is only two, that should be 50gp instead. (And it would then give a reason to have scrolls of bless weapon instead of the more generally useful oil of bless weapon which is also listed at 100gp).
Mr. Patient
Adventurer
Here's a couple more:
DMG p. 48, under Multiple Monsters and Encounter Levels: "The Monster Manual entry on ogres shows that they are CR 2."
That was 3.0; now they're CR 3.
DMG p. 208, on Epic Druids: "The druid may have a maximum number of animal companions equal to twice her class level, as normal."
I don't think this statement makes sense under either 3.5 or 3.0 rules, but perhaps I'm mistaken about that.
DMG p. 48, under Multiple Monsters and Encounter Levels: "The Monster Manual entry on ogres shows that they are CR 2."
That was 3.0; now they're CR 3.
DMG p. 208, on Epic Druids: "The druid may have a maximum number of animal companions equal to twice her class level, as normal."
I don't think this statement makes sense under either 3.5 or 3.0 rules, but perhaps I'm mistaken about that.
Number47
First Post
The thing that is starting to truly bug me about finding these errors is, I'm not looking for them!
The Truly Horrid Umber Hulk is listed as having a better AC if flatfooted.
I also think that the gaze attacks of creatures are not being explicit enough to mention that they are something other than yet-another supernatural power (that would take a standard action to activate versus one opponent).
The Truly Horrid Umber Hulk is listed as having a better AC if flatfooted.
I also think that the gaze attacks of creatures are not being explicit enough to mention that they are something other than yet-another supernatural power (that would take a standard action to activate versus one opponent).
The Spectrum Rider
First Post
MM, pg. 237
On pg. 316 it says: "A swarm composed of Fine or Diminutive creatures is immune to all weapon damage."
However, on Pg. 237, under "Bat Swarm - Diminutive Animal (Swarm)", in Special Qualities, it says "half damage from slashing and piercing."
The other Diminutive creature swarms have "immune to weapon damage" - except for the Spider Swarm, which has no mention of weapon damage at all.
It's also kind of strange that the Hellwasp Swarm has "damage reduction 10/magic" in addition to "immune to weapon damage." What would the damage reduction apply to?
The Spectrum Rider
On pg. 316 it says: "A swarm composed of Fine or Diminutive creatures is immune to all weapon damage."
However, on Pg. 237, under "Bat Swarm - Diminutive Animal (Swarm)", in Special Qualities, it says "half damage from slashing and piercing."
The other Diminutive creature swarms have "immune to weapon damage" - except for the Spider Swarm, which has no mention of weapon damage at all.
It's also kind of strange that the Hellwasp Swarm has "damage reduction 10/magic" in addition to "immune to weapon damage." What would the damage reduction apply to?
The Spectrum Rider
