BiggusGeekus@Work
Community Supporter
johnnype said:
It hurts some folk's eyes. Not mine, or even those of anyone in my group, but this isn't the first complaint I've seen.
3.5 interior pictures!
- Thread starter Krug
- Start date
It hurts some folk's eyes. Not mine, or even those of anyone in my group, but this isn't the first complaint I've seen.
Monk's unarmed strike is treated as both manufactured weapon and natural weapon for purposes of spells or effects that improve them.
It specifically mentions both magic fang and magic weapon! Rock on.
Not only do they both apply to the monk's unarmed strike, but I'd say it pretty strongly implies that a single magic fang casting applies to all attacks for monks.
Skaros
It specifically mentions both magic fang and magic weapon! Rock on.
Not only do they both apply to the monk's unarmed strike, but I'd say it pretty strongly implies that a single magic fang casting applies to all attacks for monks.
Skaros
Iron_Chef
First Post
The 3.0 to 3.5e conversion guide is also reprinted on this site!
http://www.gamingreport.com/modules...le=index&req=ShowFile&file_wrap=html/dd35.htm
http://www.gamingreport.com/modules...le=index&req=ShowFile&file_wrap=html/dd35.htm
Olgar Shiverstone
Legend
The books look great!
Nice new art is a plus, as are the combat diagrams. The combat sections are much clearer reading. I'm looking forward to getting mine!
Nice new art is a plus, as are the combat diagrams. The combat sections are much clearer reading. I'm looking forward to getting mine!
BOZ
Creature Cataloguer
some commentary from the monster corner... 
had a good look at the table of contents for the new MM... well, at least the first half of it that was on that site. doesn't look like a whole bunch was changed.
mostly additions were comprised of either variations of creature types already in the original book (bralani eladrin, dread wraith, gauth beholder), or what looks to be examples of monsters with character levels (aboleth mage, frost giant jarl, hound archon hero), and some refugees from books already in print like the manual of the planes (githyanki, githzerai, inevitables).
also, of note, the celestials appear to be separated out into separate sections, as they should have been all along: archon, eladrin, guardinal, and the celestials formerly known as "aasimon" will apparently now be known as angels.
had a good look at the table of contents for the new MM... well, at least the first half of it that was on that site.
doesn't look like a whole bunch was changed.mostly additions were comprised of either variations of creature types already in the original book (bralani eladrin, dread wraith, gauth beholder), or what looks to be examples of monsters with character levels (aboleth mage, frost giant jarl, hound archon hero), and some refugees from books already in print like the manual of the planes (githyanki, githzerai, inevitables).
also, of note, the celestials appear to be separated out into separate sections, as they should have been all along: archon, eladrin, guardinal, and the celestials formerly known as "aasimon" will apparently now be known as angels.
MeepoTheMighty
First Post
johnnype said:
Yeah, they're my biggest beef - I like almost everything I've heard about the revision so far. It just seems that since no books beyond the original 3 had lines, the lines were a thing of the past. It seems silly for them to use them again. *shrugs* It's not going to stop me from buying the revision, it just seems like it would have been a natural time to get rid of the lines.
Liquid Snake
First Post
Is that a "+1 to attack" wrtten on the chart/pic/image/ thingy that explains "Charge"? Because up on the text it clearly says "+2 to attack" like it should be.
Thanks for the link Krug!
Thanks for the link Krug!
Similar Threads
