D&D 3E/3.5 [3.5] New Spellcraft Use

[kreynolds]

Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: [3.5] New Spellcraft Use

Of course, if your character needs a Spellcraft check to detect a Fireball after a saving throw...well, he probably has some big problems!

I think any problems aside from being burned to a crisp are extraneous at that point.

 

[Nail]

Re: Re: Re: [3.5] New Spellcraft Use

That's an interesting idea, so I went and checked...it looks like Scry isn't strictly "targeted," so I don't think this new use of Spellcraft is applicable to Scry attempts.

The Metallian

If it was, Scry has all sorts of ways to detect it now. First the save, then the Int check, then the spellcraft check! Eeesh! No more scry-buff-teleport for you!

 

[Liminal Syzygy]

Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: [3.5] New Spellcraft Use

nevermind

 

[smetzger]

Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: [3.5] New Spellcraft Use

Yeah, it was the lack of a "Target" entry that led me to that conclusion. D&D often uses terms like "Targeted" in a pretty specific manner (like in Potion-making rules...that's why we couldn't make See Invisibility potions in 3.0, but we can now), so I assumed that was the case here.

eerh....

I realy wish they would put things like 'target' and the named bonuses in italics so you can pick them out quickly.

 

[Metallian]

Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: [3.5] New Spellcraft Use

eerh....

I realy wish they would put things like 'target' and the named bonuses in italics so you can pick them out quickly.

You know, that would be a really good idea. Many "game terms" are also common words.

The Metallian

 

[Metallian]

Re: Re: Re: Re: [3.5] New Spellcraft Use

If it was, Scry has all sorts of ways to detect it now. First the save, then the Int check, then the spellcraft check! Eeesh! No more scry-buff-teleport for you!

Exactly...that's another reason why I'm going to interpret "Targeted" that way.

The Metallian