Goolpsy said:If you are used to 2e.. i would clearly suggest 3.0 is it so much closer to 2e. I might even say that 3.0 and 3.5 is nearly as far apart as 2e and 3e...
Egad, man, bite your tongue! If you want vintage, use 1e.Nail said:3.5e simply has more publisher support. Why bother going backwards...and if you want "vintage", why not stick with 2e?![]()
krunchyfrogg said:I'm not a newbie to D&D, but my experience is mostly with 2e. I plan on playing some PBP or PBEM games, and most of them I see are these versions (3 & 3.5).
Which of the two is a better system, and will work better in the format I've detailed?
TIA.
Actually, as has been noted above, you'll be very happy with the watering-down. The Three H's.Herobizkit said:but whatever you do, don't lay them side-by-side and compare; you'll be sorely disappointed at the watering-down of 3.5 spells.

(Dungeons & Dragons)
Rulebook featuring "high magic" options, including a host of new spells.