D&D 3E/3.5 3e's first ever specialty priest!
ForceUser
Explorer
I think this is a lot of unnecessary work on your part, but hey, have fun 
Clerics don't have to wear heavy armor just because they can, any more than a fighter has to use a greatsword just because he can. Nor must they be meleers, or nukers, or anything else. They only have to be what you roleplay them to be. With the entire divine spell list available to them, clerics can go many directions without ever taking a kit or prestige class, or prestige class variant (which is what I consider your Pioctelite).
Clerics don't have to wear heavy armor just because they can, any more than a fighter has to use a greatsword just because he can. Nor must they be meleers, or nukers, or anything else. They only have to be what you roleplay them to be. With the entire divine spell list available to them, clerics can go many directions without ever taking a kit or prestige class, or prestige class variant (which is what I consider your Pioctelite).
Chacal
First Post
Re: Apologies
You don't need to apologise. The link I provided was just a way to provide an example of specialty priest that didn't claim to be the first one, combined with a shameless plug .
I'll try to be more constructive when I'll have more time.
I also had a brandobaris priest somewhere. I'll check if I could find it.
Using attractive titles is sometimes a two-sided blade (and that doesn't mean more damage, that means exotic proficiency required)
Chacal
Al said:
You don't need to apologise. The link I provided was just a way to provide an example of specialty priest that didn't claim to be the first one
, combined with a shameless plug .I'll try to be more constructive when I'll have more time.
I also had a brandobaris priest somewhere. I'll check if I could find it.
Using attractive titles is sometimes a two-sided blade (and that doesn't mean more damage
, that means exotic proficiency required)Chacal
