Belen
Legend
Ranger REG said:Yeah, and it doesn't help that the TCG division of WotC is siding with Hasbro against the RPG R&D Group.
Oh? I have not heard anything. Please explain.
Ranger REG said:Yeah, and it doesn't help that the TCG division of WotC is siding with Hasbro against the RPG R&D Group.
CharlesRyan said:Yes, please explain!
CharlesRyan said:Yes, please explain!
OK! Since you are obviously here and reading this thread, how about giving us the answer to a simple little question?CharlesRyan said:Yes, please explain!
Honestly, I don't mind minis, just as long you keep releasing RPG products alongside with them.Rasyr said:No, you haven't.
That is also part of the reason why I think that 4e will be much more minis oriented as well - The collectibility aspects involed. Just look at how the D&D minis are done now. Base sets and random booster packs, just like Whiz Kids and their clicky games (collectible minis).
Just speculating. I can't help but disagree with some of your company's business decisions, that include the release of 3.5e in 2003. I guess it is a lot easier for me to forgive you all if you have outside business influence that is beyond your control.CharlesRyan said:Yes, please explain!
Ranger REG said:Just speculating. I can't help but disagree with some of your company's business decisions, that include the release of 3.5e in 2003. I guess it is a lot easier for me to forgive you all if you have outside business influence that is beyond your control.
What if they don't have a year in mind? What if they aren't planning 4e at all?Rasyr said:All you have to do is to name a year.
Was I that assertive?MerricB said:That wasn't speculation. You were asserting as fact that "it doesn't help that the TCG division of WotC is siding with Hasbro against the RPG R&D Group."
Can you please explain further?