Nightchilde-2
First Post
Grimstaff said:I would like to see more 4E elements designed around Frogger.
I'm a Q-bert man m'self, and with all the shifting and such around the battlefield, well..I'm a happy camper.
Grimstaff said:I would like to see more 4E elements designed around Frogger.
Cadfan said:"has some similar traits" /= "is like"
Falling Icicle is just like Hitler. Falling Icicle has a nose. Hitler has a nose. Falling Icicle has feet. Hitler has feet! The list goes on...
But this mean we can psychoanalyze people based on what they say!Wormwood said:4e is essentially a Rorschach test.
Everyone sees what they want to see.
I think we've been doing that all along. Or at least I have...Ya Weirdo!Mustrum_Ridcully said:But this mean we can psychoanalyze people based on what they say!
Wait. You don't?Mustrum_Ridcully said:But this mean we can psychoanalyze people based on what they say!
I think different weaknesses and strength is the "point" of the roles. A Defender simply does different things then a Wizard.evildmguy said:Hmmm.
Having played WoW and now LotRo, I don't think DND is like them and I hope 4E will not be like them.
In LotRo, there is some overlap of special class abilities. Unfortunately, these abilities work regardless of type. So, if classes have a stun ability, it works on ALL creatures! If it's a ghost, a flying creature, a drake, whatever, it works. There is an ability to slow creatures. Several classes have it. So, the loremaster slows people with wind. The hunter does it with an arrow. But, again, this works on anything regardless of type. So, I amused when my arrow slows the ghost, wolf, wight, hawk and drake all the same!
I am sure they did that for game balance within a computer game. I am hoping 4E doesn't do that and that eventually, if not right off, there are some things that have weaknesses and strengths that certain classes will be better at.
Hmm. I guess we will see. Maybe this is what 3E did but it got complicated and they are looking to remove that?
edg