Undrave
Legend
You're right. The trick is to kill them off before they get too annoying.
Actually, I don't allow monks.
Well then, let's use the SECOND LEVEL Spell "Spider Climb" and just climb up the sheer surface.
You're right. The trick is to kill them off before they get too annoying.
Actually, I don't allow monks.
Again: If you want to fix the Monk, you'll have to throw away the six attributes.
Totems aren’t exactly a global thing. The closest thing in Europe are horse poles of Scandinavia, but they aren’t remotely the same.Maybe ask some Asian people if people have ever assumed they know martial arts, and if they’ve ever been bullied or harassed because of it. It’s quite common. Perhaps especially so in America? Regardless, the stereotype exists and causes harm whether you live in a place where it’s frequently happening or not.
They’re not specifically coded as anything. They are very loosely based on Western folklore, but they are not presented as explicitly European. You could maybe argue that the Druid is vaguely Celtic, but the actual Celtic mythological influences in the class are minimal. Monk is the only Class with a sidebar about reskinning weapons to fit a certain cultural aesthetic. It’s the only class that has a feature named for a concept from a specific religion. It is clearly coded in a way that other classes are not. That coding is racial and not cultural because the Monk’s influences are a vague pan-Asian mishmash, not any particular culture (though Indian influences are conspicuously absent). It’s textbook orientalism.
I think that would be a problem, if barbarians were more modeled after any particular real-world groups. Like, if they were black coded, or Native American coded, or otherwise coded in a similar way to how Monks are Oriental coded, yeah, that would be more egregious.
The 3.5 monk was a much worse class than the 5e monk.that is definitely the way to making more realistic anything.... charisma is also very problematic.... but with the existing 6 stats 3.5 did a much better job of making monks and offering customizability.....
The 3.5 monk was a much worse class than the 5e monk.
"worse" ?? usually ppl mean from a "balance" point of view. If that is what you mean then i might agree. But it made more sense..... and balanced is usually addressed in game..... you have a crazy barbarian who finds some PHAT armour/weapons and becomes unbalancing? you give sommat PHAT to the wizard to offset it a little.....
Well then, let's use the SECOND LEVEL Spell "Spider Climb" and just climb up the sheer surface.