Torm said:Without at least a potential for change, dimensionality is meaningless. I could say that I have a 4th dimension to my physical existance called "feidth", and maybe even come up with decent math for it, but unless something actually moves along a change scale of feidth like they do width, it is complete bullpocky.
I think what we have here is a failure of terminology. Is your depth dimension "change in length"? If not, then the 5th is not "change in time".
I didn't say that things cannot move in the 5th. Quite the opposite, in fact. I was saying that if the 4th and 5th are not completely independant, they aren't really separate dimensions.
Time is a dimension that already exists. If one then says that the 5th is "change in time", that means that what happens in the 4th depends upon the 5th. These two are thus linked, and dependant upon one another. Movement in one is restricted by the other, and the two cannot really be considered separate.