As a child I read the entire series. Reflecting on it now, I find myself wondering about the notion of “made for children” and what that means.
The books – and the movie, if it is true to source material – will have sections that are both frightening (in the short term) and disturbing and thought provoking (in the long term). These are not characteristics normally associated with “made for children,” at least not in this age when “made for children” usually, means the worst kind of pabulum.
The Lion (a stand in for God), and his confrontations with the Witch (a stand in for the Devil) still lurk in the back of my skull, 20+ years after reading the books.
In addition, there are humorous elements in the books that involve talking animals, but this humor is all “veddy Briddish” and about 60 years old. Even with that, it is not over all a humorous work.
I also agree with Eric Noah, handling the development of Edmund will be the single most important feature to developing the story.
I would write more, but there is a mysterious woman offering me Turkish Delights…
The books – and the movie, if it is true to source material – will have sections that are both frightening (in the short term) and disturbing and thought provoking (in the long term). These are not characteristics normally associated with “made for children,” at least not in this age when “made for children” usually, means the worst kind of pabulum.
The Lion (a stand in for God), and his confrontations with the Witch (a stand in for the Devil) still lurk in the back of my skull, 20+ years after reading the books.
In addition, there are humorous elements in the books that involve talking animals, but this humor is all “veddy Briddish” and about 60 years old. Even with that, it is not over all a humorous work.
I also agree with Eric Noah, handling the development of Edmund will be the single most important feature to developing the story.
I would write more, but there is a mysterious woman offering me Turkish Delights…