Zaruthustran
Tinkerhouse Games
Hey, is this the first 4E rules argument based on an actual game session (as opposed to just arguing theories)? We could be witnessing history!
Zaruthustran said:Hey, is this the first 4E rules argument based on an actual game session (as opposed to just arguing theories)? We could be witnessing history!
History in the making... I rolled my History and got a success... 
Zaruthustran said:Hey, is this the first 4E rules argument based on an actual game session (as opposed to just arguing theories)? We could be witnessing history!
jimpaladin said:I want to thank the OP for this thread! I read earlier in the day and now just read the lateast "to me" entry. What I was going to knock the lack of Fluff. Every DM knows that is what gets the creative juices flowing.
*Unless you work in a mathamatical field or related in which case numbers might be it for you!
I'm in sales the only number I like is the one in my bank![]()
Pagan priest said:Thanks. This thread has done far more to induce me to consider actually buy 4E than all of the previous previews combined.
valeren said:Great encounter. Thanks for the post.
Just curious, do you guys have any idea on what the comparative levels of 4e characters are to that of 3.xe ones? I mean, like what CR in 3.xe encounters can be at par with the new buffed up 4e level 1 characters?
Thanks

(Dungeons & Dragons)
Rulebook featuring "high magic" options, including a host of new spells.